Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gondramB

Whistleblowers ARE able to expose it. Here's the problem with saying that federal courts should protect them from retaliation instead of civil service boards:

"To accept Mr. Ceballos's argument, the majority concluded, would be to commit state and federal courts to 'a new, permanent and intrusive role' overseeing communications among government employees and their superiors."

We generally agree but there is a real problem divining where you protect political whistleblowers and where you attack their political bosses for day-to-day decisionmaking. I lean towards the belief that the federal courts shouldn't be in that business if only because being in that role will make them a political branch.

Now, having said that, why is it that the liar cop wasn't prosecuted? Who is in LA that isn't doing their job, including the Fibbies who investigate government corruption? We know the answer--the system protects itself, the people must take it on for corruption to end, and they are equally corrupt (at least, in LA they are).


134 posted on 06/01/2006 2:31:51 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile ('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Bill, McQueeg and the President related?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianInExile

Those are excellent points - I'll rethink this through the day at work. Thanks.


136 posted on 06/01/2006 6:55:41 AM PDT by gondramB (We may have done a lill' bit of fightin amongst ourselves but you outside people best leave us alone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson