Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rarestia
I completely understand the mentality behind this: CYA for the gubmint, but am I off by saying this is a violation of 1st Amendment freedoms?

An unfortunate ruling if it is as described. I'd like to read more when the opinion comes out to see exactly how the majority defines this.

Unless we were very wrong about Alito and Roberts, I think this article may be biased. In addition, the press is naturally going to hate anything that might dry up their confidential whistleblower sources.

I'll wait for the opinion before taking this rather vague article at face value.
125 posted on 05/31/2006 9:28:27 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: George W. Bush

The opinion is already out. http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05pdf/04-473.pdf


126 posted on 05/31/2006 10:01:15 AM PDT by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson