[staytrue]

At least 14 of the Republicans who voted in favor of the Senate immigration bill are NOT up for re-election in 2006. To suggest we wait past the 2006 elections to take action is a non-starter.

And how do you propose getting rid of people who are not up for reelection ? My solution is to get rid of the democrats who are up for reelection.

[Jameison]

"My solution is to get rid of the democrats who are up for reelection"

I support anything that gets rid of RATS. :)
Especially since most of the RATS voted for amnesty.

[savedbygrace]

You don't win the point by taking my reply out of context. Savage Beast had claimed that 'we' will take the RINOs out in the primaries, and I was saying that idea wouldn't work, because so few of them are up for re-election in 2006.

This is why it is critical that the House reject the Senate bill now, and why our efforts need to be concentrated on pressuring all House members to reject the Senate bill. No bill is better, much better, than the Senate bill.

But please tell us which Dimocrat Senators who are up for re-election in 2006 you have a plan to get rid of. Which ones are vulnerable?