Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: staytrue

Your figures are entirely wrong.

"A few hundred years ago the lifespan was 30 to 40 years"??? Your invention.

Marriage in the late teens and early twenties was common until recently, when free sex became culturally acceptable. There is nothing wrong with late teen/early twenties marriages, btw.

The only reason the averages say shorter lifespans (and your figures are way, way off) was becasue of higher infant mortality. Once a person made it through childhood, many made it into their 70s, and this is consistent throughout much of history.


36 posted on 05/30/2006 6:33:52 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

In any event, shorter life spans means marry earlier.

Also, in the old days, work meant physical labor while today, it often means intellectual labor. That means today, marriage, sex should be delayed, compared with the old days. However, the biology has not changed as much as the culture and that produces conflict.


38 posted on 05/30/2006 6:42:21 AM PDT by staytrue (Moonbat conservatives-those who would rather have the democrats win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah

Marriage for girls in their mid to late teens was acceptable. However, it was a much different world they lived it.


39 posted on 05/30/2006 6:44:01 AM PDT by Jaded (does it really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson