You seem to be clear already.
I drew parallels between the MSM's treatment of the Pantano case and this one. The disgruntled media and military fabricators turned out to be the accusers in Lt. Pantano's case and Murtha and the MSM are operating in an identical manner in the present case. Too convenient for words.
I use the qualifier "exonerated" to indicate that only in that event would action be pursued against Murtha, although I do believe that the Marines will be exonerated.
If the Marines are exonerated, Murtha has committed sedition and given aid and comfort to the enemy. There is reason to propose that he committed these offenses even if the Marines are convicted. Like Lincoln, I will not allow this activity, and to AVOID trashing the Constitution I would remove Murtha RATHER than the Constitution. Remember, treaty law is superior to the Constitution. When Murtha and the MSM try to bend the Constitution to protect seditionist activity, a patriot's duty is to give them an object lesson in how's it's done.
Finally King George called patriots criminals, however he didn't get to make the definition, the winners did, they defined themselves as patriots. I plan to win, stuff it.
You care about it so little - why give lip service to saving it?