Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran admits it is trying to develop nuclear fusion
The Scotsman ^ | May 30, 2006 | NASSER KARIMI

Posted on 05/29/2006 5:26:06 PM PDT by MadIvan

IRAN is pressing ahead with research tests on nuclear fusion, a type of atomic reaction which has yet to be developed for commercial power generation, a senior Iranian official said yesterday.

Iran said in the mid-1990s it was working on nuclear fusion research but this is the first mention in years that the work is continuing and comes at a time of heightened tension over Iran's nuclear programme.

Iran has been hauled before the UN Security Council for failing to convince the world that its nuclear work is not being used to make weapons. Tehran insists it only wants to generate electricity.

"Iran has done various fusion tests for research purposes at its Amirabad research reactor over the last few years," the official said, referring to the reactor in central Tehran, adding that Iran was continuing to carry out such tests.

"We do fusion tests for research purposes from time to time," he said.

Commercial nuclear reactors rely on nuclear fission, a process that generates energy from splitting atoms.

Fusion tries to generate power by joining the nuclei of atoms together, but scientists have yet to develop a commercial way of doing this so that it produces more energy than it consumes.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: dreamonhairball; iran; irannukes; nuclearfusion; nukes; proliferation; rotsaruck; yeahright
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Can we hit these crazy blighters now, please?

Regards, Ivan

1 posted on 05/29/2006 5:26:09 PM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Texican; Watery Tart; Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; pax_et_bonum; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 05/29/2006 5:26:59 PM PDT by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Gee, I'd be real disappointed if it blew up in their faces!(NOT!)
3 posted on 05/29/2006 5:28:52 PM PDT by airborne (Satan's greatest trick was convincing people he doesn't exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Obviously trying to be the first nation to travel to Alpha Centauri. /sarc.

Monkeys messing with a football have a better chance of winning the Super Bowl.

4 posted on 05/29/2006 5:37:06 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"We do fusion tests for research purposes from time to time," he said.

Of course you do. When you are trying to produce a missile capable weapon, you need to do that sort of experimentation. Thanks for confirming what we already suspected.

5 posted on 05/29/2006 5:37:34 PM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne

Yes with any luck it will take out half the country.


6 posted on 05/29/2006 5:45:58 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"Iran has done various fusion tests for research purposes at its Amirabad research reactor over the last few years," the official said, referring to the reactor in central Tehran, adding that Iran was continuing to carry out such tests.

Now what kind of person would it take to be idiotic enough to think that Iran is promoting nuclear technology for anything else but for political clout?

Perhaps I'm being a bit extreme and Iran really doesn't have billions of barrels of oil beneath them to survive without an alternative energy source to get by with.

7 posted on 05/29/2006 5:47:26 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

There is no peaceful purpose for nuclear fusion.


All day on FoxNews they've been running this story that says that "fusion, like fission, can be used for both peaceful and military purposes."

Sorry, guys, but it's not true.


8 posted on 05/29/2006 5:50:36 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

I cannot fathom the current regime in Iran outlasting the Bush administration.


9 posted on 05/29/2006 5:51:32 PM PDT by Spruce (Keep your mitts off my wallet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

I was doubtful that Israel would attack Iran until this report. I don't think that Israel could tolerate Iran having an H-bomb. One H-bomb could wipe out all of Israel.


10 posted on 05/29/2006 5:53:18 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

11 posted on 05/29/2006 5:53:49 PM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
There is no peaceful purpose for nuclear fusion.

Oh?

http://www.iter.org/

12 posted on 05/29/2006 6:09:36 PM PDT by ordinaryguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ordinaryguy

A quote from your link:


"that aims to demonstrate the scientific and technical feasibility of fusion power..."

In other words, it has not yet been demonstrated.


13 posted on 05/29/2006 6:30:38 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
So, when the various countries were conducting nuclear research during WWII, would you have maintained that "there is no military purpose for nuclear fusion/fission"?

Because at that time, it had not yet been demonstrated.

14 posted on 05/29/2006 6:36:15 PM PDT by ordinaryguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ordinaryguy

The first nuclear reactor was built at about the same time as the first a-bomb, actually a little before. However, yes, I would say that there was no peaceful use for nuclear power at the time.

And most of the people who are currently working on fusion believe that a usable fusion reactor is decades or even centuries down the road, even in the US. I don't think that Iran is going to supply the break-thru.


15 posted on 05/29/2006 6:42:53 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Sounds like they want to skip a step and head straight for the H-bomb.


16 posted on 05/29/2006 6:46:45 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (© 2006, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
However, yes, I would say that there was no peaceful use for nuclear power at the time.

I asked if you would have claimed that there was no military purpose for nuclear fusion/fission. If there were no military purposes, then the military shouldn't have been spending money on it.

And most of the people who are currently working on fusion believe that a usable fusion reactor is decades or even centuries down the road, even in the US. I don't think that Iran is going to supply the break-thru.

Are you concerned that the Iranians are wasting their money? What exactly are you afraid Iran might do with a tokamak, if they built one.

17 posted on 05/29/2006 6:53:27 PM PDT by ordinaryguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ordinaryguy

I don't believe they are building a tokamak. They are trying to build an H-bomb. They could care less about a tokamak.


18 posted on 05/29/2006 6:55:28 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
They are trying to build an H-bomb.

They may or may not be, but as far as I can tell, that is not what this article is about.

19 posted on 05/29/2006 7:02:33 PM PDT by ordinaryguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ordinaryguy

You are reading the article wrong. The practicality of fusion is nearly negligible. They admit they are researching fusion. They certainly are not researching something that we've spent 50 years researching and gotten nowhere. They are obviously researching the H-bomb. That is the only practical use for fusion at this time.


20 posted on 05/29/2006 7:09:33 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson