[mrsmith]

"The legislative material is irrelevant to the bribery case and there is no need to search or seize it for evidence. "

Yes there is because that is what the evidence is hidden in. The prosecutors knew that- it is blindingly evident- and had rules to limit their looking at those privileged documents

All that is in dispute is what rules should be.

[Polybius]

"The legislative material is irrelevant to the bribery case and there is no need to search or seize it for evidence. "...........Polybius

Yes there is because that is what the evidence is hidden in. The prosecutors knew that- it is blindingly evident- and had rules to limit their looking at those privileged documents All that is in dispute is what rules should be.

All search warrents spell out the items, place and persons to be searched. The presence of other individuals or items in the area does not preclude searches from ever laying eyes on them. They simply can't rifle through them.

When the searcher found $90,000 in cash inside a freezer, it is blindingly evident that that was not "legislative material".