Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith
BS, it is all about the congress trying to cover it's ass. The law was followed and they don't like it because they think they have immunity. And, yes, they did say the debate clause gave them protection. They have tried that in the past and been slapped down at least twice by the courts.

Try to spin it all you want, this is a case of the legislative thinking is is above the law.

261 posted on 05/28/2006 10:38:50 AM PDT by calex59 (No country can survive multiculturalism. Dual cultures don't mix, history has taught us that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]


To: calex59
The law was followed and they don't like it because they think they have immunity. And, yes, they did say the debate clause gave them protection. They have tried that in the past and been slapped down at least twice by the courts.

You're confused. They're not immune from prosecution, and nobody's making such a claim. They *are* immune from having legislative documents searched, seized, investigated, and/or used as evidence in a court of law.

334 posted on 05/28/2006 5:21:56 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson