[don-o]

I read post 113 five times. And, no I have never seen the opening of Parliament. But, another posted clarified.Big deal.

Maybe I am missing something in your "people's house" argument. There is a legally issued search warrant. The case law is in place that holds a critter not immune.

[acsrp38]

I never said Jefferson was immune. I have said over and over and over and over again that there was probable cause to search Jefferson's office. He is not immune to the law. he is a scum bag and a theif. I am NOT defending Jefferson.

I was just pointing out that Hastert was not wrong to object in principle to the search. The two are not mutually exclusive.

I am just warning that in this case the search was justified, I am also warning that the precedent set could be horrifying to an unscrupulous executive. Imagine this in the hands of the Clintons.