Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: acsrp38
There is an historical point to be made. The House is the "people's house". The "executive" or the "judicial" has no right to invade or search the people, their "house" has to be jealously guarded. (Remember that now you can indict a "ham sandwich") The Brit's love of pomp and circumstance sometime serves as a good object lesson. They slam the door in the face of the King/Queen. In the time of the colonies, it was procedure to search without cause the members of the local governments. King Charles I did it to Parliament. To search a congressional office (the only government body which was originally elected directly by the people until the XVII Amendment) would be the same as spying on "the people". The precedent exists to protect the "business of the people" and not meant to put Congress above the law.

Precisely!

Thanks for posting this good explanation of the issues at hand.

120 posted on 05/28/2006 8:04:08 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: B Knotts

Thank you.

The FBI was right, Hastert was right. Both were doing their duty


127 posted on 05/28/2006 8:10:56 AM PDT by acsrp38 (Warning!!! If we voted against God in NE - we will vote against you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson