Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
The article said that is a felony. She "shot a deadly missile into an aircraft".

If it didn't get into the aircraft, that law can't possibly hold.

Now, she attempted to do so. That is different.

However, one can't rightfully say a bottle rocket that even the pilot said didn't jeopardize the aircraft was a "deadly missile".
2 posted on 05/27/2006 10:00:42 AM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMind

Could have put an eye out.


3 posted on 05/27/2006 10:02:01 AM PDT by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind
She needs to do this in Albuquerque
4 posted on 05/27/2006 10:03:48 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind

In "No-Longer-a-Nation-of-Laws" America of 2006, anything that is an inconvenience for "Law Enforcement" is illegal.


22 posted on 05/27/2006 10:25:32 AM PDT by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind
"Thompson allegedly ran out of her house with a bottle rocket launcher..."

Presumably, a bottle!

"Thompson is facing a felony charge of shooting or throwing a deadly missile into an aircraft."

That seems a stretch, especially that it went *into* an aircraft. If so, she's a great shot, though.

45 posted on 05/28/2006 1:37:58 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Delicacy, precision, force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson