Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Principled
For a 9% drop to occur, each component in your example would have to drop 9%.

Right, every other scenario would have less than a 9% cost reduction like I said.

See, the thing is that only labor is taxed under the present system, and some corporate profits to a a lesser extent. And the amount of tax that is going to be eliminated through all the chains of production is going to be that component of domestic labor called the Employer half of MM/S.

So, you can look at any product and trace it all the way back down to when it came out of the ground or when the labor was performed, and there will be some component of that cost that was attributable to some domestic laborer getting paid wages to do work. And that is the area that will get to save money under the nrst-- and it is 7.65% of whatever part of that product was made up of labor.

if there was a lot of labor, then there will be at most 7.65% that can be removed in total from the cost. Then there is a relatively negligible amount of compliance savings, and some coporate taxes which are paid as a percentage of some of the profits at each stage of the production.

If that totals up

141 posted on 05/27/2006 11:50:52 AM PDT by RobFromGa (The FairTax cult is like Scientology, but without the movie stars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: RobFromGa
If that totals up

Yes, very simple. Only the simple-minded can't understand it.

146 posted on 05/27/2006 12:53:18 PM PDT by balrog666 (There is no freedom like knowledge, no slavery like ignorance. - Ali ibn Ali-Talib)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson