Replies

You would think that the social conservatives would care about what Judges that our President might appoint to the Courts *maybe even the SCOTUS* during his final 2 YEARS of his term. And what a Rat controlled Congress might do to the type of people that he will be able to nominate. Throw your little hissy fit now, and hopefully you'll all come to your senses before the midterms. "Cutting off your nose to spite your face" comes to mind when I read these immature rants. We have RINOs from some states because the people in these states are NOT conservative and they WILL NOT elect a conservative. Deal with it.

We need to target the Blue and Purple states and run good candidates against all RINOs and Democrats.

We have RINOs from some states because the people in these states are NOT conservative and they WILL NOT elect a conservative.

It's true in my state (Illinois) I vote for and support conservative candidates but I am clearly in the minority. I believe that is the case in all states that have large cities that dominate the political scene of the entire state, cities that are enclaves of the "gimme something for nothing" crowd.

It's true in Mass, N.Y., Calif. and Illinois. Look at who we have as U.S. Senators in those states.

… Throw your little hissy fit now, and hopefully you'll all come to your senses before the midterms. "Cutting off your nose to spite your face" comes to mind when I read these immature rants.… Yeah. That's gonna make me eager to support the GOP. Maybe you could list for me a few of the successes the social conservatives have received for their 26 years of sincere, loyal support of the GOP -- since the first election of President Reagan. Honestly it seems to me as if our issues are always on the back-burner, and your post shows exactly the attitude that causes it -- AND how likely you are to push our issues in the future.

You would think that the social conservatives would care about what Judges that our President might appoint to the Courts *maybe even the SCOTUS* during his final 2 YEARS of his term. And what a Rat controlled Congress might do to the type of people that he will be able to nominate. Throw your little hissy fit now, and hopefully you'll all come to your senses before the midterms. "Cutting off your nose to spite your face" comes to mind when I read these immature rants. We have RINOs from some states because the people in these states are NOT conservative and they WILL NOT elect a conservative. Deal with it.

For some people this is more than about simple politics. It's actually about the health and welfare of our nation. The GOP won't lose the House this fall and W stays. So big deal, we lose a Senate that is lib anyway, GOP included in large measure!

The whining and blubbering is on the side of those taking your argument. At this rate the GOP will be a carbon copy of the Dim party during the Clinton years in another decade. Boy howdy, won't that be great!

The problem is less "who's in office" vice what's happening in politics at large, namely the firm entrenching of self-servants into positions of power. If something isn't done about that, and post haste, then we'll be able to start kissing quite a bit good bye pretty soon. The government is fast not becoming "of the people, by the people, and for the people," but "of the people, by the government, and for the government." Somehow I fail to see this as the vision that the Founding Fathers had.

So so what, the Dims take the Senate where all we get is Dim/lib policy and bills anyway. BOO HOO! So what, let 'em try to impeach W. If that's what the Senate spends its time on between '06 and '08, then great. W hasn't shown much of anything since his first couple of years and certainly a disappointing second term to date, and his position on immigration may as well be Hillary or Kennedy in office!

But maybe having a Dim Senate may slap enough Americans in the face to do something in the '08 elections! If not, well, then pucker up and bend over trying to shove your head between your legs!