Posted on 05/26/2006 10:44:18 PM PDT by peggybac
you can't provide for yourself or protect yourself. how dare you try to teach your children? /s
And a ping for you...
TOO LATE!
TT
Down with the UN.
and how many battalions does the UN command on US soil?
DO IT NOW
He pointed out two such amendments have been proposed in Congress.
DO IT NOW
Finally, he says specific threats to parental rights can be solved by "putting a clear parents' rights amendment into the black and white text of the United States Constitution."
DO IT NOW
write you congresscritters and senators NOW
Good point. Thank you.
We need to get the Dept. of Edu. GONE.
Immaterial. How many military people would intervene to defend the rights of a citizen in conflict with a judgment from a duly constituted court, however bizarre it might be?
Enforcement is by police, which are progressing into "regional police." Support your local sheriff. It's your last line of defense.
They have plans written to put all military of every country under the command of the UN - or troops would no longer be our sovereign military but belong to and be under the control of the UN...
Also, the UN has a gun control law ready to go that, put side by with Hitler's gun control law - is almost verbatim.
Also, the UN is working on a law that would require every child, upon the hour of it's birth, to be registered with the UN - and on and on
seems to me the Constitution already explicitly addresses this:
ARTICLE IV
...
Section 3....
2. The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this constitution shall be so construed as to prejudice any claims of the United States, or of any particular state.
Section 4. Republican form of government guaranteed. Each State to be protected.
The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union, a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened), against domestic violence.
...
...
ARTICLE VI
...
2. This constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any thing in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.
PING
I have plans to conquer the Martians.
so?
they have no hope in hell of enacting these plans.
see post 12.
all of our soldiers swear an oath. if it has not changed since my day, it requires the soldier to protect and defend the CONSTITUTION from all enemies, foreign and domestic.
this UN nonsense, if they tried to enact it, would be a clear and obvious attack on the sovereign and republican form of government the Constitution details, as excerpted above.
QED - no soldier could obey the UN and his oath.
and how many battalions does Mexico command on US soil?
The US Senate already agrees with the CFR, what makes you think they would disagree with the UN?
Well Private New tried to fight UN command/controll and he got courtmarshalled.
damn martians, they piss me off sometimes too :)
the fact that this, and many other UN nonsense, remains unratified by that self-same Senate could be considered such an clew.
iirc, that was in Bosnia, yes?
what has that to do with the soldier's oath, being outside the US and not related to US sovereignty on US territory?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.