Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: servantoftheservant

That would be true if we were talking about the 1800s, ranges, and cattle drives. It's not done like that anymore. Technology has allowed advances in feed that do just the opposite of what you state. Try not to be an idiot before accusing someone else of being one.


10 posted on 05/27/2006 2:10:25 AM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: All

A majority of Hindus would eat beef if they would get a safe and clean enough supply of beef...The main problem is that the refrigeration facilities are non existent or very costly....Electrical power is unreliable....So meat is better consumed withinn hours of slaughter...That explains the small size of that industry....


11 posted on 05/27/2006 5:10:29 AM PDT by MunnaP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: edpc; servantoftheservant
"That would be true if we were talking about the 1800s, ranges, and cattle drives. It's not done like that anymore. Technology has allowed advances in feed that do just the opposite of what you state."

Quite wrong. The cattle population uses up a lot more arable land and consumes a lot more feed even with advances in cattle feed.
13 posted on 05/27/2006 7:04:50 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: edpc

And even in case of non vegeterian diet sea food, mutton, pork and poultry are much cheaper and easier to produce as compared to beef.


14 posted on 05/27/2006 7:11:34 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson