Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HERE'S AN IDEA! LET'S LIMIT FREEDOM! (Boortz)
Nealz Nuze ^ | 5/26/06 | Neal Boortz

Posted on 05/26/2006 6:52:33 AM PDT by rattrap

Some organization, the Consumer Federation of America, has has come up with an amazingly stupid idea on how to combat high energy usage. They want to ban advertising of gas-guzzling SUVs on television [pdf]. They have other brilliant ideas, such as an SUV buyback program. Just who would buy them back? Well, I would suppose this gaggle of idiots would propose that either the government (which means the taxpayers) or the automakers buy them back. Either way the cost is passed down to individuals; either taxpayers or shareholders. They also want a federal gas tax that would stabilize, as they call it, gas prices at about four bucks a gallon. Oh .. and they say they have polls showing strong consumer support for their ideas.

In the America of 2006 you don't have to look far to find someone who will tell you of all of the problems we can solve by just limiting freedom with more government controls and regulations. We have an obesity problem, why not ban the advertising of foods that exceed a certain caloric or fat content? How about a cheeseburger buyback program?

The really sad thing is that these idiots actually manage to get media attention.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: boortz; gasprices; nannystaters; suvs; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: CJ Wolf

ROFL!!!!!
LOL!!!!!!!


21 posted on 05/26/2006 8:22:39 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

You are wrong. Insurance statistical data proves your wrong. SUV's are safer than compacts.


22 posted on 05/26/2006 8:26:47 AM PDT by 38special (I mean come'on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 38special
You are wrong. Insurance statistical data proves your wrong. SUV's are safer than compacts.

I'm sure they are safer in an actual accident; my philosophy is more along the lines of avoiding the accident. A large, unwieldy, poorly handling vehicle with crappy braking and bad rear tire traction is not good for avoiding accidents, although it's good for surviving them if they happen.
23 posted on 05/26/2006 8:33:36 AM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson