Skip to comments.
U.S. Supreme Court may decide case of woman facing deportation
AP ^
| 5/25/06
| GARANCE BURKE
Posted on 05/25/2006 6:10:12 PM PDT by AZRepublican
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: MarcusTulliusCicero
I really think it's Senator Cracker. He's got to be an embarrassment to all those votes in Carolina, don't they have recall down there???
21
posted on
05/25/2006 6:59:13 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
To: VOA
Yes, I thought that was quite thought provoking.
22
posted on
05/25/2006 7:02:42 PM PDT
by
Eagles6
(Dig deeper, more ammo.)
To: AZRepublican
"In declining States the leadership intuitively choses the most harmful course of action."- A great historian 1888
23
posted on
05/25/2006 7:07:33 PM PDT
by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: Brilliant
Seems like the government could have come up with a better case to prosecute than this one, unless of course, they were hoping to use this case as a rallying call for liberal immigration reform. DING DING DING DING DING DING DING DING ! We have a winner!
BTW, this is related to the way bureaucrats assign the lowest budget priority to the items that will generate the most complaints if cut. That way, it will be impossible to cut anything.
24
posted on
05/25/2006 7:28:39 PM PDT
by
supercat
(Sony delenda est.)
To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
"In declining States the leadership intuitively choses the most harmful course of action."- A great historian 1888 Probably related to my observation about bureaucracies (previous post)
25
posted on
05/25/2006 7:29:42 PM PDT
by
supercat
(Sony delenda est.)
To: CrawDaddyCA
I like how the pro-illegal groups pull out the 'tear jerker' stories to justify the crimes of illegal criminals.Yep. It's called the "compassion trap", and it's used to rationalize everything from late term abortion to securing the "rights" enemy combatant terrorists captured in Afghanistan.
To: LaineyDee
"I'm sure Fox would make an exception to allow hubby to work and buy property...NOT." Why would they want to buy property in Mexico when she's applying for citizenship here?
ncountylee was using whatcha call "sarcasm" to make his point about... oh, never mind.
27
posted on
05/26/2006 7:32:02 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: Redbob
I understand. I was also using a bit of sarcasm in my response. :)
28
posted on
05/26/2006 8:58:32 AM PDT
by
LaineyDee
(Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
To: AZRepublican
Since she has been here several years, is married to an American and had a kid here, and there are millions of other illeglas they aren' targetting, WHY are they targetting her???
Perhaps to try and discredit people who want to deport illegals, that's why. They are making a trial case of an unusual circumstance and then will apply the result to all the illegals infesting our respective states and plaguing the border.
Don't underestimate the Byzantine thinking of Alberto Gonzales.
29
posted on
05/26/2006 9:10:34 AM PDT
by
ZULU
(Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
To: ZULU
at a certain level of mega law firms. Cases are set up for LOSS on appeal in order to establish law outside of the legislative process.
Judges are less expensive than politicians and don't have that pesky voter nusance.
30
posted on
05/26/2006 9:18:21 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson