Skip to comments.
REPLY TO THE RESPONSE OF I. LEWIS LIBBY TO
GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE
US DOJ ^
| 5-24-06
| Patrick Fitzgerald
Posted on 05/25/2006 5:21:48 PM PDT by STARWISE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Rest at link.
1
posted on
05/25/2006 5:21:52 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
To: SE Mom; the Real fifi; Enchante; backhoe; A Citizen Reporter; AliVeritas; alnick; AmericaUnited; ...
Scooter Ping!
2
posted on
05/25/2006 5:22:54 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(((They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL autho)
To: STARWISE
Fitz is perpetrating a fraud on the American Public.
3
posted on
05/25/2006 5:24:32 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
To: STARWISE
Weak, weak, weak. Fitz has painted himself into a corner here and he knows it.
4
posted on
05/25/2006 5:29:59 PM PDT
by
Dems_R_Losers
(Control the borders. Control the spending. Confirm the judges. Win the War. -- Hugh Hewitt)
To: Dems_R_Losers
And Fitz whining about a fishing expedition is rich, to say the least.
5
posted on
05/25/2006 5:30:35 PM PDT
by
Dems_R_Losers
(Control the borders. Control the spending. Confirm the judges. Win the War. -- Hugh Hewitt)
To: STARWISE
The "Persecution's" response?
"Badges!? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges! I don't have to show you any stinking badges!!"
6
posted on
05/25/2006 5:31:43 PM PDT
by
FormerACLUmember
(No program, no ideas, no clue: The democrats!)
To: STARWISE
REPLY TO THE RESPONSE OF I. LEWIS LIBBY TO GOVERNMENTS RESPONSE And that makes just all kinds of sense.
7
posted on
05/25/2006 5:32:33 PM PDT
by
humblegunner
(If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
To: humblegunner
Fitz's response is a baseball analogy...don'tcha see it?? You got sand in your eyes?? :-)
8
posted on
05/25/2006 5:38:07 PM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: STARWISE
Call in the shrinks the case is now about the state of mind of alllllll involved.
To: STARWISE
Thanks for the ping, STARWISE.
These responses are pathetic. Fitz is arguing in circles just to feed the leaks and misleading articles by the VIPS' reporter pets.
When will the judge be ruling on any of these motions? Doesn anyone know?
Pinz
10
posted on
05/25/2006 6:03:53 PM PDT
by
pinz-n-needlez
(Charter Snowflake, Rummy fan)
To: STARWISE
Fitzy is just plain old nuts and about on par with Nifong, in his mordant stupidity in trying to continue with this case.
To: STARWISE
Fitz is a booger-eating buffoon.
12
posted on
05/25/2006 6:18:21 PM PDT
by
TSchmereL
("Rust but terrify.")
To: STARWISE
So, is he calling Madame Cloe to attest to everyone's state of mind? Or is he just bringing in the Magic 8 Ball?
To: pinz-n-needlez
Trial is next spring, I believe, so we'll be seeing all his happy poppycock for awhile, as the law-errrrrs volley back 'n forth.
14
posted on
05/25/2006 6:25:20 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(((They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL autho)
To: McGavin999
15
posted on
05/25/2006 6:30:26 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(((They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL autho)
To: STARWISE
16
posted on
05/25/2006 6:50:40 PM PDT
by
AmeriBrit
(ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS A WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION, IT INCLUDES TERRORIST SLEEPER CELLS!!)
To: STARWISE
17
posted on
05/25/2006 6:55:07 PM PDT
by
Dems_R_Losers
(Control the borders. Control the spending. Confirm the judges. Win the War. -- Hugh Hewitt)
To: STARWISE
This is an amazing paragraph/sentence in the posted portion. Disclaimer: there may be more amazing paragraph/sentences in the rest of the reply to the response to the response to the reply to the response at the posted link:
The Vice Presidents handwritten notes on a clipping of the Wilson Op Ed, which reflect his views concerning Mr. Wilson and his wife, are evidence of the views the Vice President communicated during the conversations that the Vice President and his chief of staff had during the period immediately following the publication of the Wilson Op Ed, and corroborate other evidence regarding these communications, which are central to the governments proof that defendant knowingly made false statements to federal agents and the grand jury.
I'm out of breath after reading this. What writing! What hogwash!
18
posted on
05/25/2006 7:05:29 PM PDT
by
Auntie Mame
("If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all." --Grandma)
To: STARWISE
Contrary to defendants suggestion, the relevance of the Vice Presidents annotations of the Wilson Op Ed is not remotely comparable to the purported relevance of the documents defendant seeks in his Third Motion to Compel. I had no idea it was so difficult to get information out of the government, especially considering they think they have such an excellent case against Libby. Three motions to compel means they are causing Libby's attorney fees to escalate, it's probably $20,000 for each one of these three motions, and maybe more. Of course, the government has bottomless funds, we're paying Fitz and his minions to attempt to keep Libby from being able to defend himself.
I don't know, maybe it's me, but if my case were so good, I don't think I'd be averse to giving my documentation to the other side. Wonder what Fitz has to hide?
19
posted on
05/25/2006 7:14:15 PM PDT
by
Auntie Mame
("If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all." --Grandma)
To: STARWISE
So let's see if we have this straight. Fitzgerald believes that Libby lied to the grand jury and FBI because Libby didn't want anyone to know how involved Cheney was in rebutting the mendacious Wilson op-ed. And how does Fitzgerald know this? Because Libby revealed Cheney's deep involvement during his grand-jury testimony! http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110008426
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson