Having finally heard her talk, she is very bright and sure enough of what she knows that it would take a very rare physics mind to out-argue her. She is also current enough in philosophy to be able to stand her ground in C/E debates.
She has to be more than bright to conceptualize and put a sound theory to such an idea.
As for the creationists and evolution debate, it's not even worthy of her time.
Nor anyone's in my opinion. It's entirely about science vs. people who want to argue outside science.
I've never understood why people can't understand evolution as part of God's process since there are so many other things beyond even our understanding.
As if God were not capable of such a process.
Silly.
(Not an endorsement or question of finality on the evolution theory.)