Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN

I agree with you that this is a load of BS, but only because IMO it doesn't matter in the slightest. His technical point is that an egg which is fertilized earlier or later than the optimal time is much less likely to survive. Any IVF clinic knows this well -- there's a very narrow window in which an egg can be fertilized and become a viable embryo, but for a time before or after that the egg will still fertilize but won't get past one or two divisions before dying. Obviously the clinics choose to ensure that fertilization happens at the optimal time whenever possible; what the guy in this article is pointing out is that the rhythm method involves choosing NOT to fertilize at the right time, even though this doesn't consistently equate to not fertilizing at all. Eggs have to be perfectly ripe to fertilize AND continue developing, but they don't have to be perfectly ripe to just fertilize and form a zygote.


61 posted on 05/25/2006 10:11:01 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: GovernmentShrinker
What? Nonsense. The ovary 'pops out an ovum' when the ovary pops out an ovum, the ovum doesn't 'ripen' thereafter based upon whether the woman has sex or not, the ovum migrates down the fallopian tube waiting to be fertilized. Fertilization occurs in the fallopian tube, usually. The 'readiness' of the uterine lining to receive a zygote (the embryo) is not dependent upon whether a couple does or doesn't have sex at a particular time. Explain how having sex or not having sex effects the uterine lining.
90 posted on 05/25/2006 11:43:51 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson