[SampleMan]

Your support for legalizing crack, but enforcing speed limits is still a glaring contradiction.

Please do explain your tyrannical support for speed limits. Especially if the person built their own car and is driving by themselves on a road without another car in sight.

How can you just assume that the person is dangerous based on the speed of their car? What is your proof? And just because one person that speeds causes an accident, why are you wanting to convict all of them?

Other than breaking your bogus speed limit law, what other law have they broken? Take away the speed limits and the traffic tickets and problems would plummet right? Because as you point out "no law, no violation".

I'm dying to hear your contorted answer.

[coloradan]

Please do explain your tyrannical support for speed limits.

I'm starting to think you can't comprehend. I never said that I supported speed limits, in fact, I stated they were openly admitted to be mere revenue enhancement. Instead, I mentioned reckless driving once, and "excessive speeding" once, both of which should be up to the police and/or judges to determine on a case-by-case basis under the prevailing conditions of traffic and weather.