And you certainly forgot that we're talking about hypothetical changes to the traffic laws. I have already stated that speed limits, at least, are openly admitted to being revenue enhancement efforts, and that if the state profits directly from violation of laws, it becomes in their interest to prohibit as many things as they can. So, someone with some modicum of intellectual capacity might conclude that I don't support the present ticketing system, and would support something else. But, that apparently eludes you.
You couldn't reason your way out of a wet paper bag.
Do you even know what a wet paper bag is? (I know, it's a rhetorical question, don't bother answering.)
You can state it a few more times and it still won't make it true. Incidently your genius idea of making up speed limits on a moment-to-moment basis is going to be hand out what for violators, decoder rings?