[SampleMan]

Similarly, SM was/is unable to distinguish between a peaceful drug user and an armed robber, which is why he supports violent rights deprivations even against the former - at your and my expense.

Coloradan - Try getting your facts right. I differentiate very well. I just don't consider one of them to be innocent because the other is worse.

Palmer - If you haven't read all of these posts, I highly recommend it. Its most enlightening, humorous, and will save you some time.

[palmer]

I read them, you mopped the floor with the libertarians.

[coloradan]

Try getting your facts right. I differentiate very well.

I asked you how someone merely possessing drugs harmed you, and your response was "1. One of them stuck a 9mm in my face" which isn't drug possession, it's armed robbery. So either you can't tell them apart, or you can't comprehend my question. Giving you the benefit of the doubt, I went for the former. Is there a third alternative?

You have repeatedly cited violent crimes in response to my questions about otherwise peaceable drug use, much as Million Moms will talk about school shootings and "blood in the streets" when people ask about gun ownership or carry permits, etc.

I'll try one more time: How are you harmed by someone else possessing and using drugs? For the sake of argument, assume they grew their own - which is something I have stipulated before as well.