Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TradicalRC
As I recall, Galileo submitted to the Catholic Church. I have no problem with him, he recognized the importance of the church unlike his impious followers.

Yes, the Catholic Church was supreme in everything. They knew through dogma demonstrated by the Bible, that the earth was central to everything, and Galileo's belief that the earth revolved around the sun was heresy and he was so convicted by the Inquistition. He was imprisoned for having such thoughts and trying to tell the world about them. Is that the kind of disregard for the Church's moral authority you are referring to? And you wonder why intelligent people question some of the Church's dogma today? Do you approve of how the Church has handled scientific inquiry such as that of Galileo?

120 posted on 05/26/2006 3:09:29 PM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: MACVSOG68
Yes, the Catholic Church was supreme in everything. They knew through dogma demonstrated by the Bible, that the earth was central to everything, and Galileo's belief that the earth revolved around the sun was heresy and he was so convicted by the Inquistition. He was imprisoned for having such thoughts and trying to tell the world about them. Is that the kind of disregard for the Church's moral authority you are referring to? And you wonder why intelligent people question some of the Church's dogma today? Do you approve of how the Church has handled scientific inquiry such as that of Galileo?

Do you understand what Dogma is and consequently how absurd your assertion that the Church taught the Earth central to everything let alone anything?

Let's see -you can not provide anything but "feelings" couched in moral relative arguments in regards to your support of the homosexual disorder being something to be accepted and tolerated as at worst innocuous and not meriting legitimate discrimination... Now you wish to attempt to bash the Catholic Church using the same "free thinking" moral relative methodology -your hidden motive (assuming the obvious will once again be denied)?

A suggested reading assignment: The Galileo Affair

SMALL EXCERPT:

Unjust Condemnation

Galileo's condemnation was certainly unjust, but in no way impugns the infallibility of Catholic dogma. Heliocentricism was never declared a heresy by either ex cathedra pronouncement or an ecumenical council. And as the Pontifical Commission points out, the sentence of 1633 was not irreformable. Galileo's works were eventually removed from the Index and in 1822, at the behest of Pius VII, the Holy Office granted an imprimatur to the work of Canon Settele, in which Copernicanism was presented as a physical fact and no longer as an hypothesis.

You may be an "expert" on moral relatively arguing in support of the homosexualization of society; however, it would appear you are way out of your league in attempting to disparage the Church. You may want to reconsider this latest tact as well potentially fruitless?

P.S. You may be on the wrong Forum? What Free Republic is all about:

Statement by the founder of Free Republic

As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc. We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our borders, our constitution and our national sovereignty.

Free Republic is private property. It is not a government project, nor is it funded by government or taxpayer money. We are not a publicly owned entity nor are we an IRS tax-free non-profit organization. We pay all applicable taxes on our income. We are not connected to or funded by any political party, news agency, or any other entity. We sell no merchandise, product or service, and we offer no subscriptions or paid memberships. We accept no paid advertising or promotions. We are funded solely by donations (non tax deductible gifts) from our readers and participants.

We aggressively defend our God-given and first amendment guaranteed rights to free speech, free press, free religion, and freedom of association, as well as our constitutional right to control the use and content of our own personal private property. Despite the wailing of the liberal trolls and other doom & gloom naysayers, we feel no compelling need to allow them a platform to promote their repugnant and obnoxious propaganda from our forum. Free Republic is not a liberal debating society. We are conservative activists dedicated to defending our rights, defending our constitution, defending our republic and defending our traditional American way of life.


122 posted on 05/26/2006 5:46:55 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: MACVSOG68
There are many secular myths regarding Galileo, who was a good Catholic, as was St. Robert Bellarmine. You can look into the Truth of the matter, if you'd like.
124 posted on 05/27/2006 6:34:55 AM PDT by TradicalRC ("...this present Constitution, which will be valid henceforth, now, and forever..."-Pope St. Pius V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson