Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Death Of The Nation State
World Net Daily ^ | 5/23/2006 | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 05/25/2006 5:06:50 AM PDT by FerdieMurphy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
They (illegal criminals) march defiantly under Mexican flags in American streets demanding the rights of U.S. citizens – while an intimidated political class rushes to accommodate and appease them, assuring itself this is but the latest reincarnation of Ellis Island.

FYI

1 posted on 05/25/2006 5:06:51 AM PDT by FerdieMurphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

"Turks in Europe identify more and more with the Islamic faith"

Is that really true?


2 posted on 05/25/2006 5:13:46 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

Let me pose this question: if the red states were to write a constitution and the blue states were to write a constitution, how much similarity would their be?

I suggest it is time that we think about departing ourselves from those peoples and ideas that have turned the blue states into charnel houses run by the slave masters of the urban elites and the governmental bureaucracies.

I am quite willing to see our erring sisters go.

McVey


3 posted on 05/25/2006 5:17:38 AM PDT by mcvey (Fight on. Do not give up. Ally with those you must. Defeat those you can. And fight on whatever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

Pat Buchanan BUMP.


4 posted on 05/25/2006 5:19:02 AM PDT by reelfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

Indeed.


5 posted on 05/25/2006 5:22:06 AM PDT by FerdieMurphy (For English, Press One. (Tookie, you won the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes. Oh, too late.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

Yes, if this is a real question. The Turks have elected an islamist government, although, with the way the Turkish government is structured, it may not effect Turkish foreign policy as much as it does domestic policy.

The Turkish government has banned the veil (at work anyway) for its Civil Service employees since the days of Ataturk. That policy is now under review and I suspect it will be overturned.

McVey


6 posted on 05/25/2006 5:24:02 AM PDT by mcvey (Fight on. Do not give up. Ally with those you must. Defeat those you can. And fight on whatever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mcvey
But McVey. We must stop this polarization between the separate ideologies of the American people. We must all come together and do what the leftist, American-hating batards wish.

Reach out.

Heal.

or is it heel?

7 posted on 05/25/2006 5:24:19 AM PDT by FerdieMurphy (For English, Press One. (Tookie, you won the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes. Oh, too late.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude
Quite possible. The Turkish government is, by law, extremely secular -- Ataturk saw to that. Religious display, such as women wearing head-scarves, is illegal in government buildings.

Turks who are more fundamentalistically inclined may find it easier to practice that in Germany and the rest of Europe than in Turkey.
8 posted on 05/25/2006 5:27:00 AM PDT by Celtjew Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

Years down the road we will either be fighting the Chinese under a Muslim flag or fighting the Muslims under a Chinese flag.

In either case I don't think the Libs will be too happy when all the people are rounded up and used as human waves to take the edge off the other side.

But they are happy now as they take us down that path.


9 posted on 05/25/2006 5:28:30 AM PDT by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

Heel, I think.

There is no compromise left in the system. I appreciate the fact that a few deluded Senators and Representatives fight on to hold us to gether. It is a noble undertaking. But the coastal elites disdain us and the urban elites mock us and the media elites lie about us.

One side or the other will triumph or we will separate.

McVey


10 posted on 05/25/2006 5:38:33 AM PDT by mcvey (Fight on. Do not give up. Ally with those you must. Defeat those you can. And fight on whatever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy
The transnational movement (of your posting)is really a tribal movement that the transnational groups like to disruptively play in. Strong governments with sound constitutions will persist. We should not succumb---in fact---we should get 80-90% of the UN(and other such organizations) out of the USA and then get the US out of the UN.
11 posted on 05/25/2006 5:41:46 AM PDT by verbal voter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcvey

That's a very good point, but it's also something that has been a fact of life in this country since its founding. In fact, I would make the case that the United States of America as envisioned by its founders really only lasted a few years before it began its inevitable decline. The official "demise" of the nation occurred with the events leading up to the Whiskey Rebellion of the early 1790s, when a bunch of settlers living on the frontier recognized this and did exactly what you suggested.


12 posted on 05/25/2006 6:12:29 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

So let's get this straight Pat.

We should welcome the passing of our own soveriegnty to the new transnational organizations?

OK Pat. We heard it from you first.

What a visionary.


13 posted on 05/25/2006 6:20:22 AM PDT by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

So let's get this straight Pat.

We should welcome the passing of our own soveriegnty to the new transnational organizations?

OK Pat. We heard it from you first.

What a visionary.


14 posted on 05/25/2006 6:20:35 AM PDT by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcvey
There was a post a while back that revealed that blue states were blue because of giant blue cities, and red states were red because of small blue cities. Hence, the problem is in the cities, loaded with liberals, whereas the countryside has the republicans.

The point is taken the liberals' constitution would be a disaster and the conservatives would look like the one we have now.

If we were to depart ourselves it would not work out on a per state basis.

This article reminded me somewhat of the free state project.

I am gravely concerned about the non-state actors, the ms 13, and all the rest, and knowing the reconquista is the goal of the illegals flooding in. This will be the demise of the US if allowed to continue.

Pat Buchannan is a smart guy, with a classical education, who understands how the west works, and what is going wrong with it now. He would have made a good President. I'd take him over the current one any day. Unfortunately, he lacks tact, which gives anyone who is predisposed to disagree with him an opening to shut down debate by hurling ad hominems and brand him, in this PC environment, a racist or anti-semite, or a nut.

15 posted on 05/25/2006 6:20:50 AM PDT by Jason_b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jason_b

There was a post a while back that revealed that blue states were blue because of giant blue cities, and red states were red because of small blue cities. Hence, the problem is in the cities, loaded with liberals, whereas the countryside has the republicans.




Vermont is just about the most rural state in the country, but it is also one of the most socialist leaning states in the country. We need a different theory.


16 posted on 05/25/2006 6:28:33 AM PDT by rob777 (Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jason_b

Jason:

I couldn't agree more on the need for conservatives to behave with the utmost tact since every little thing we do is scrutinized with the utmost care.

I well remember that the knock on Goldwater was that he was not smart enough.

And then the knock on Reagan was that he was not smart enough.

And then the knock on the present Bush is that he is not smart enough.

Hmmmm, there could be a pattern here.

I know the countryside, if you include the exurbs, is conservative. The problem is that the cities include the headquaters for everything from insurance companies to manufacturing to the MSM to the textbook publishers. Unless we are able to get by the media and educate the public, we will get squeezed to death. We may have nothing to do but try to depart. I would at least like to have the threat on the table so that we could push for the revival of the 10th Amendment and the original limits of the 14th revived.

I am really not being radical here. I do believe in victory even if it involves brinkmanship.

McVey


17 posted on 05/25/2006 6:37:17 AM PDT by mcvey (Fight on. Do not give up. Ally with those you must. Defeat those you can. And fight on whatever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

AC:

That period is my primary era of concentration. The Whiskey Rebellers were neither united nor focused. They were just angry and reactive.

The conservative areas of the country need to put the possibility of secession on the table as part of our bargaining with the coastal elites.

But I am not going to disavow the option of departure.

McVey


18 posted on 05/25/2006 6:40:02 AM PDT by mcvey (Fight on. Do not give up. Ally with those you must. Defeat those you can. And fight on whatever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mcvey

Yes, but they were "angry and reactive" for some very specific reasons that related directly to what perceived as steps back toward British rule on the part of the new Federal government in Washington.


19 posted on 05/25/2006 7:10:04 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy
Pat Buchanan distorts the situation in Bosnia by referring to its two parts as Serb and Croat-Muslim. The half of Bosnia that is not the Republika Srpska is Muslim-dominated, from what I have heard.

The last ruler of independent Montenegro was King Nicholas I (ruled 1860 to 1918, died 1921). As of the 1940s his grandson Mirko, born in 1908, was the claimant to the throne...I don't know if he has any descendants interested in being a constitutional monarch. Another grandson of Nicholas I was the last king of Italy, Umberto II.

Montenegro has more people than Luxembourg or Iceland. It's about 2/3 the size of Slovenia.

Famous Montenegrins include Milovan Djilas, Radovan Karadzic, and Nero Wolfe (the last reputedly fictitious).

20 posted on 05/25/2006 7:56:41 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson