Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: for-q-clinton

" when he defended Jefferson"

First: He did not defend Jefferson, bribe taking scumbag. He was concerned --- rightly or wrongly --- about the executive branch interfering with the operations of the legislative branch. There is a huge difference.

Second: I strongly suspect this was a ploy to get the issue of William Jefferson, Democrat and bribe taker, on the front page and keep it there. Hastert will shortly say, "upon reflection, it certainly appears the FBI jumped through all the hoops necessary. . . . etc"

This will leave the Dims out there complaining about the search.


242 posted on 05/25/2006 9:07:43 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]


To: MeanWestTexan

Please...if he really did that...I've just lost any respect I had left for him.

If he's playing with the consititution to get political advantage..then he's lowered himself to the Bill Clinton level of politics (possibly lower).


244 posted on 05/25/2006 9:16:10 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson