Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jetson
Wrong. Extremely bad science. Fuel consumption at speed is a result of drag, not engine technology. While it's true that cars today use less gas at 70mph than previous generations of vehicles, today's most modern cars still use more fuel at 70 than at 80.

Drag is an exponential force. A car cruising on a highway at 50 mph (80 km/h) may require only 10 horsepower (7 kW) to overcome air drag, but that same car at 100 mph (160 km/h) requires 80 hp (60 kW). With a doubling of speed the drag (force) quadruples per the formula. Since power is the rate of doing work, exerting four times the force at twice the speed requires eight times the power. So, until they design an engine that uses less fuel while generating 40hp than it uses while generating 100hp (a physical impossibility) your statement is going to be absolutely false.

306 posted on 06/06/2006 3:52:38 PM PDT by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Melas

All very interesting information but my truck gets some of its best gas mileage at 70 MPH. Why do they do wind tunnel tests if drag is unbeatable?


314 posted on 06/07/2006 5:38:01 AM PDT by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]

To: Melas

Not exponential, though, it's a simple speed-squared (drag) or speed-cubed (power required) relationship. So doubling speed will result in 4 times the drag, and 8 times the power required to go that speed. Going 75 mph rather than 60 results in the aerodynamic drag being (75/60)^2 = 56% higher, and 93% more power required to overcome the aerodynamic drag.


388 posted on 12/21/2006 3:23:03 PM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson