Klein works at Time...
...how would he know?
Damned if I know.
Posted on 05/23/2006 7:13:43 PM PDT by Mia T
BTTT
We will most certainly assist Professor Peter's Principle's preeminent poster person, predator and prevaricator, the recidivist co-serial rapist, Ms Rodham Clinton's PoMo-babblin', tongue-chewin' idiot savant self immolation and political flameout. And we will be aided and assisted in our pouring kerosene on her fire by the ever more deadly dangerous to America and the FRee World consequences of the Rodham-Clinton-Schwartz treason facilitated modernization of China's nuclear and rocketary forces. And by the Able-Danger revelations of other aspects of their destructive treasons and obstructions.
But who is the Republicans' 2008 candidate and where is he hiding?
BTTT!
Of course... and so did many adults I knew when I mentioned this alleged 'incident' back in 1999 when Lisa Meyers interviewed her on NBC. Tom Brokaw threatened to quit if the story was aired... and all the other MSM 'usual suspects' avoided it like the plague. We all thought it was just MSM bias back then... they loved Rapist42 and his Marxist-totalitarian wife. It would take Dan RATher to show us how far the 4th Estate would really go for the DNC.
Estrich is a hypocrite when she states this... because Clinton meets all the standards she lists for the perpetrators of this act:
“ ...the man is a neighbor, an acquaintance, or a date. The man and the woman are both white, or both black, or both Hispanic. He is a respected bachelor, a student, a businessman, or a professional. He may have been offered a ride home or invited in. He does not have a weapon. He acted alone.”
By 'playing-dumb' when it comes to Clinton's behavior... a person she is supposedly close to... one would question the value of her book... and her opinion.
The clinton cult does all her dirty work while ms. cattlefutures tries to appear neutral to it all. It's the same old routine with every step calculated; so very obvious, so very boring, yet, so very dangerous.
Thanks for all you do in keeping evil exposed. We have our own "clinton cult LIEbrary" here!
Did you hear Klein on TV the other day opining that she wouldn't run for POTUS and would be in the Senate for 20 years instead?
It's even worse than that, I know young people of voting age who don't know what the Soviet Union was!
Who is Klein and how would he know?
|
Joe Klein says missus clinton won't run because he sees that woman as a loser, i.e., as the quintessential bland, phony, prefabricated, sock-puppet sort of candidate who, along with the political handler, are the subject of his new book.
Even if Democrats could liberate themselves from the intellectually and morally stifling grip of consultants like Shrum, would they have any coherent ideology to espouse? Peter Beinart |
TYVM for that reply.
you're quite welcome :)
Out of 300 million Americans, 1 American is calling out an unaccountable, corrupt-to-the-core, Senator.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
thanx.:)
Incorrect!
With Hillary truly being -the wizard standing behind the curtain - the chinagate curtain
-and ushering in and out of the White House- the following chinese agents and other cronies-
that definitely will hurt her/ and deservingly so:
Ng Lap Seng, Yah Lin "Charlie" Trie; Manlin Foung, Wang Mei Trie, John Huang, Jane Huang, Johnny Chung, Col. Lui, Jing Wei Li, Irene Wu, Liu Tai-ying, Bin Liu, Irene Wu, Nora Lum, Shi JinYu, Shi-Zeng Chen, Xiao Yang, Liu Chao-Ying, Wang Jun, Wah Lim, General Ding Henggao, General Chi HaoTian, General Fu Quanyou, Chief of the General Staff of the PLA, Lt. Gen. Huai Guomo, General Kui Fulin, "Col. Xu", Gen. Liu Huaquing, William Peh, PRC Defense Minister Chi Haotian, China Resources chairman Shen Jueren, Lt. General Xiong Guangkai, Wang Liheng, vice-president of China Aerospace Corp, Gen. Ji Shengde, Bao Peide, 5th Vice Minister of the PRC, Zou Jia Hua, Vice Minister National Technology Planning, Lt. General Xu Qiliang, Chief of Staff of the PLA Air Force, Lt. General Wu Quanxu, Deputy Chief of the General Staff of the PLA, Zhu Roug-ji, Vice Premier of National Finance, Liu Ju-Yuan, Minister of China Aerospace Corporation (made both satellite orbiter version of Long March and the nuclear tippled missile version for the PLA), Keshi Zhan, Yue Chu, Xiping Wang, Nan Nan Xu, Chun-Fat Leung, Chang-Lin Tien, Liao Minglong, Tian Yi, Chen Qingchang, Pan Yongming, Shao Xingsheng, Jiangsu Yongli, Tongsun Park, David Chang and Sister Ping. Bernard Schwartz/Loral, Marvin Rosen, Keshi Zhan, Ken Hsui, Ms Melinda Yee, Hoyt Zia, Ira Sockowitz, Sidney Blumenthal, Leon A. Panetta, Lanny Davis, Harold Ickes, William Meddoff, Alexis Herman, Jamie Gorelick, Hazel O'Leary, Mark Middleton, Nancy Hernreich, Craig Livingstone, Lynn Cutler, Neal Ainley, Maria Hsia, Robert Meyerhoff, Roger Tamraz, Joseph Landon, David Wang, Indonesian Arief Wiriadinata and his wife Soraya and convicted Miami drug trafficker Jose Cabrera; and also her ongoing association with China Poly Group Corporation / "Polytechnologies Incorporated," along with Hillary's ongoing ties with Ted Sioeng, Mochtar and James Riady and the Lippo Bank-Lippo Group & Lippo Pacific in Indonesia.
|
WHY HILLARY IN THE OVAL OFFICE IS A NATIONAL-SECURITY NO-NOPART ONE
For example, the one prominent name missing from Hillary's recent "tell-all" book is Riady. Mrs. Clinton failed to mention the Riady family at all. One would get the impression that the Riadys were not present in the Clinton White House. Hillary Clinton certainly overlooked listing the table settings and menus for White House dinners with the Riadys. The Riadys knew the Clintons from their Arkansas years, when Moctar bought out a local bank. Moctar and his son James were close to Bill and Hillary through 1992 and into the White House. Moctar even owned the firm selected by Hillary Clinton to replace the White House travel office. Riady and Hillary Moctar and James Riady played a key role in bringing the Clintons to power in Washington. The Indonesian billionaire and his Lippo banking company managed to contribute large sums of money to the Clintons' campaigns even though it was against the law. Moctar's gardener contributed $450,000 directly to Bill Clinton in a single check. James Riady, Moctar's son, eventually pleaded guilty to campaign violations. The connections between the Riadys and the Clintons have a much more sinister theme than simple foreign money inside U.S. elections. Testimony before the U.S. Senate revealed Moctar Riady's involvement in Chinese espionage. The Lippo Group is in fact a joint venture of China Resources, a trading and holding company "wholly owned" by the Chinese communist government and used as a front for Chinese espionage operations. Mrs. Clinton not only knew the Riadys but took their money as well. To prove my point I need only to cite photographic evidence. Her picture with Moctar Riady is certainly damning evidence of a relationship that spanned several bank accounts and two decades. It is often said that a picture tells a thousand words. However, Hillary's pictures not only tell stories left out of her book but they also netted $10,000 each for the DNC in illegal donations. Hillary's Most-Wanted Mrs. Clinton has left us with a wide selection of photo evidence. Mrs. Clinton has had her photo taken with drug dealer Jorge Cabrera. Jorge donated a load of drug money to the DNC in order to get close to the first lady. Jorge is currently serving federal time for smuggling 3,000 pounds of cocaine into the United States. |
bttt
Katherine Prudhomme challenges Susan Estrich -- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1511356/posts
|
Massive conflict of interest (especially when combined with the clintons' perfect record of allowing their self-interest to trump national interest) is yet another reason we must never ever allow the clintons to retake the White House. Evidence of the clintons' massive conflict of interest is everywhere, yet no one besides Byron York seems to see it.
THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY: |
|
Sprinkle a bit of conflated clintons (the "twofer" construct) HERE, a dash of 'divorced' clintons THERE. This NYT piece is intended to emphasize the latter clinton state.... Or rather, it's supposed to de-emphasize the former, which has, in fact, bombed. The clintons' recent promotion of the clinton 'twofer' construct seems to have worked against clinton self-interest, (which, in case you haven't noticed, is the only kind of interest that interests the clintons). It is not surprising that iterative instances of clinton conflation would increase--not decrease--the rate of decline of the sock-puppet's already sinking poll numbers. (2 x 0 = 0) Thus enter Pinch to help the clintons reverse the process, which I don't believe will work any better. (1 x 0 = 0, too.)
|
He spoke for both of them, alternating between oily racist and reliable misogynist. Instead of striking out as her own person in this friendly venue--it was the Coretta Scott King funeral, for heaven's sake--she reprised their '92 electoral refrain. 'Two for the price of one' would be, at it had always been, the order of the day. NO BARGAIN If they didn't know in '92 that one was not enough, they certainly know it now. (Refuting the axiom that 2 x 0 = 0), their 'twofer' construct remains the lifeblood of her electoral--(and, arguably, non-electoral)--life. She of the 'plantation' blunder simply wouldn't play here. He, as First Black President?, was providing cover. And still, the central question remains: Can spilt oil raise a sinking ship? by Mia T, 03.18.06 |
|
Posted on 05/24/2006 5:51:56 PM EDT by JeanS So Bill and Hillary Clinton lead separate lives -- sort of. That's pretty much the conclusion of a New York Times story that was the result of interviews with 50 friends, aides and associates of the Clintons. The Times traced the former first couple's whereabouts for the past several years and found that Mr. and Mrs. Clinton have seen each other an average of about 14 days each month since the beginning of 2005. Sometimes it's more, sometimes it's less. In February 2005, the paper says, the Clintons saw each other just once -- on Valentine's Day. On the other hand, last August the two were together for 24 out of 31 days. Just why is the Times telling us this? It's not entirely clear. After all, a lot of senators and representatives spend time away from their wives or husbands. Telling us that is not telling us a lot. Instead, the Times seems to be dancing around the question of whether Bill Clinton is on the prowl again, and whether that might affect his wife's presidential ambitions. But of course the paper can't just come out and say it. So it says things like this: "Because of Mr. Clinton's behavior in the White House, tabloid gossip sticks to him like iron filings to a magnet. Several prominent New York Democrats, in interviews, volunteered that they became concerned last year over a tabloid photograph showing Mr. Clinton leaving BLT Steak in Midtown Manhattan late one night after dining with a group that included Belinda Stronach, a Canadian politician. The two were among roughly a dozen people at a dinner, but it still was enough to fuel coverage in the gossip pages." Belinda Stronach? Why were prominent New York Democrats concerned about Bill Clinton being photographed near her? The Times didn't say. Indeed, a search of the Nexis database reveals the paper has never even mentioned Clinton and Stronach together. But readers of other newspapers will know. In 2004, for example, The Washington Post ran a brief gossip report that "Canadian papers were running items about what was called a 'close personal and business relationship' between Clinton and Canadian billionaire Belinda Stronach." The Times apparently doesn't want to traffic in such rumors. So it threw out a little tastefully understated innuendo instead. It's all part of what the paper calls the "soap opera of infidelity." And yes, the Clintons have provided a lot of soap opera over the years. But their marriage raises a far more serious issue as we contemplate the idea of Hillary Rodham Clinton running for president. And that is, we have never, ever had a first spouse like Bill Clinton. The former president has so many business deals and so many political entanglements that his presence in the White House, even as first spouse, would make life very … complicated. Just go back a few months to the Dubai ports deal. Remember when we found out that, even as Mrs. Clinton denounced it, Mr. Clinton was giving his friend the crown prince of Dubai advice on how to make it work? The former president wasn't working pro bono. He has gotten tons of money from Dubai in speaking fees and in business deals involving Dubai and something called Yucaipa, which is a wildly profitable company owned by the man the Times describes as Clinton's "bachelor buddy," Ronald Burkle. Clinton has also hit on many, many world leaders to help build his presidential library and to give money to the Bill Clinton Foundation. In 2004, the most recent year for which figures are available, the foundation took in $57 million. It has certainly taken in much, much more since then. The money comes from all over the world; Bill Clinton operates on the world stage and is well-paid for it. Now, all of that is the standard stuff of ex-presidents. But they only do that kind of business after leaving the White House. Doing so in office would be absolutely forbidden and would create enough conflicts of interest to keep an army of investigators busy for years to come. But what if Bill Clinton, after leaving office and pulling in money from around the world, were to return to the White House as first spouse? It would be a terrible mess. Would it make sense if Laura Bush had business deals in Dubai, and Brunei, and Taiwan, and all sorts of other places? Would that be accepted as normal practice? Of course not, and it wouldn't be for Bill Clinton, either. So the role of the former president in a possible Hillary Rodham Clinton administration is a very serious issue indeed. It's not as sexy as the "soap opera of infidelity," and it certainly won't receive as much attention in the papers and the talk shows. But it's a problem -- a big problem -- waiting to happen. York is a White House correspondent for National Review. His column appears in The Hill each week. E-mail: byork@nationalreview.com |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
It is no secret that Hillary's past takes us through a pile of hard, cold cash from the Chinese army, Chinese army agents roaming the White House and photos with a wide variety of scoundrels.
As for Byron York's comments on 
Her head bobbed nonstop in servile compliance.... Her gaze was fawning, fixed on him.... Her mouth was frozen shut, corners upturned a carefully calibrated nine degrees above the horizontal.... Not a smile.... (Never a smile).... Just enough of an upturn to hide the