Posted on 05/23/2006 7:13:43 PM PDT by Mia T
You go, girl!
Estrich's famous rape has become nothing more than street cred for use in debunking krinton's critics. In truth, she's getting it far worse now than anything she might wept over when younger...and she doesn't even know it.
bump!
ping
I think she's talking about you. ;)
bump
Estrich on Hannity & Colmes spinning the clintons' rape of Broaddrick:
On point 1, the statute of limitation on rape applies in a court of law, not in the voting booth. The question we are deciding isn't whether the clintons should be thrown in the slammer (another matter for another day); the question is less onerous, (from the clintons' perspective, anyway): Do the clintons have the character to be president? The reductio ad absurdum is Christopher Shays' comment, made after he viewed the Ford building evidence on the rape of Broaddrick: "I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event." Asked if the president is a rapist, Shays said, "I would like not to say it that way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick." And yet Shays voted not to impeach. Purportedly because he asked the wrong question. ("Where was the obstruction of justice?") (Any cognitive dissonance Shays may have experienced rendering that verdict was no doubt assuaged by the political plum clinton gave to Mrs. (Betsi) Shays...) And so we had two more years of the clinton Kill 'em tomorrow Nano-Presidency. And with it, inexorably, 9/11. Regarding points two and three: Juanita's bitten lip, swollen to twice its normal size, the hallmark of a serial rapist, is the obvious counterexample. the clinton-clinton-Broaddrick kind of rape, according to Susan Estrich |
ping
ping
My sister sent me an email asking me to support some bill supporting women's rights that Mrs. Clinton is backing. I told her no way do I stand with Mrs. Clinton on anything. She says why. I tell her Juanita, for one reason.
Juanita who, she says. I recounted the essentials and pasted Juanita's letter to Mrs. Clinton. We'll see how my sister responds.
I know others love Mia T's posts, but I am not one of them. I prefer my info straight up, without all the graphics, no matter how clever.
I am always upet when I click on a thread, and get inundated with graphics, having failed to notice the poster. I usually avoid Mia's threads, not because she is not an observant poster, but because I just do not need to see all the clever stuff to feed my brain....
I know most of you probably have a different point of view, and please forgive my late night rant!
Juanita Broaddrick is credible. Even leftist women believe her. (Recall the Salon piece.)
"That's part of the problem with dredging up all that old Clinton stuff. More and more people have no idea what you're talking about."
Yea Susan, right! Don't you wish!!!!! But then I know better - otherwise you would try to ignore the 'dredging' instead of making comments like that!!
You certainly have a valid point of view. Each to his own taste, of course. ;)
BTW, thanx for couching the negative as positively as you did. ;)
good point. :)
fwiw, I agree.
"ALL THAT OLD CLINTON STUFF"
Is the same type comment the clintons made thru out the 90's.
"that's been discussed - that's old news - and the DBM does their -- drive by!!!!
But we're not forgetting!!!!!!!! And won't let them get away with anything!!!
One has to take seriously the observations of a "Hole-In-One, 148 yards, 8-iron" kind of person. ;)
bump!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.