Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Quix
But not a wholesale narrow, rigid, blindly biased, selfishly motivated toss in the trash of every aspect of solid research.

Like I said, tobacco use has been on the decline for that last 20 years, and they claim these "behavioural problems" have been on the increase for the last 20 years. The only evidence this "study" considers is the tobacco smoke, and they conclude that it is responsible for that increase. I'm not sure what your definition of "solid research" is, but this isn't lining up with mine.

188 posted on 05/23/2006 7:19:07 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

I think one of us misread the research.

I do not recall the research blaming

all

that increase on second hand smoke at all.

This is getting dull and wearying. I'll likely bow out before long. Cheers.


198 posted on 05/23/2006 7:24:05 PM PDT by Quix ( PREPARE . . . PRAY . . . PLACE your trust, hope, faith and life in God's hands moment by moment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson