Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant
This case is totally convoluted. Isn't Libby indicted for not remembering he talked to some reporter, but Libby's diary indicated he talked to the reporter? Now you have witnesses on the subject of where Libby learned about Plame. OK, so maybe he heard it from some CIA people and from some reporters. So what? The trial is an absurdity at this point.

I think Libby's attorney Ted Wells will eat this mess for lunch. This kind of indictment is only good for threatening a guy into pleading. When they trot out all this confusion for the jury, Wells will cut through it like the Gordian knot.

32 posted on 05/23/2006 12:02:07 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Williams; NordP

It's pathetic. And has anyone determined if she WAS COVERT?????


36 posted on 05/23/2006 12:07:19 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Williams
Fitzgerald's case is going down the toilet because he has to show that the charges that he brought was central to her being at the minimum "classified" or it's not central to the case and is just a he said, she said. Fitzy has to prove that these 2 CIA employees never had contact with the media either because that's the way Libby's lawyers will direct this and with all the leaks in the CIA I would almost guarantee these employees had spoken to the MSM at some point.
37 posted on 05/23/2006 12:09:35 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson