Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: David Allen
The man's moral standing has no bearing on one's duty to act, and his participation in a game of chance and excitement do not negate the duty others have to him.

I beg your pardon. The man deliberately placed himself in a position where he knew full well that if he failed to pull it off, others would have to risk death or die themselves in vain attempts to save him from his folly. What principle gives him a claim on their lives? No man is required to forfeit his own life for another's man selfish vanity.

There is no nobility in this folly. None. Quit trying to put lipstick on a pig.

The really "cheap dime store stuff" here is the various sappy mental mastications calling this a "good samaritan" scenario. It is not. I'm sure it makes you feel holy and self-righteous to utter these silly edicts ex cathedra from the throne of your K-Mart task chair, but you really shouldn't conflate feeble and opaque ponderousness with wisdom.

518 posted on 05/26/2006 6:40:17 AM PDT by JCEccles ( “It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself.” Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies ]


To: JCEccles

Verbosity, Eccles is thy name.


519 posted on 05/26/2006 8:22:54 AM PDT by David Allen (the presumption of innocence - what a concept!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson