Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: atlaw
Frankly, I view this as a reasonable argument for imposition of the old tort rule that once you've commenced aid...

Old? That's still legally binding and you raise a valid point. These mountain clymers may be subject to criminal prosecution.

233 posted on 05/23/2006 3:30:17 PM PDT by streetpreacher (What if you're wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]


To: streetpreacher; atlaw
Old? That's still legally binding and you raise a valid point. These mountain clymers may be subject to criminal prosecution.

My guess is Nepal and Tibet have little interest in wasting their time applying British/American-style law to the morons that engage in this sort of activity and screw up.

236 posted on 05/23/2006 3:39:46 PM PDT by Dont Mention the War (This tagline is false.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

To: streetpreacher

Oh, Mt. Everest. Duh. Never mind.


239 posted on 05/23/2006 3:46:37 PM PDT by streetpreacher (What if you're wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

To: streetpreacher
These mountain clymers may be subject to criminal prosecution.

"Tort" law refers to civil action, not criminal acts. Correct?

266 posted on 05/23/2006 6:59:35 PM PDT by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson