Ok, so for you it's the potential social impact, not really the "law breaking," per se. Just wanted to clarify.
How in the world did you get that from what I wrote?
The impact, in descending order of primacy, is apparent:
1. The breach of our national perimeter is a breach of our sovereignty as a nation and as a people.
2. The breach of our national perimeter, and the rewarding of those who do so, is a breach of the mainstay of our society, ie, the rule of law.
3. The breach of our national perimeter is a potentially disastrous breach of our national security and an actual breach in the personal security of our people.
4. The breach of our national perimeter is a breach of our national social fabric at a certain point; a point that many of us believe has been passed.
5. The breach of our national perimeter is a breach of our economic life. The costs of the current invasion are huge, affecting wage levels, housing costs, transportation costs, taxes, and the survival of our schools and hospitals, among others.