Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: garbageseeker
Actually, a more viable option is the AGM-129A Advanced Cruise Missile, which around 500 missiles were built. The B-52H is still capable of carrying this nuclear-armed stealth cruise missile, which has a range of around 1,500 miles.
11 posted on 05/22/2006 10:53:14 PM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: RayChuang88
I agree. A cruise missile strike from both a bomber or a submarine would be good. But I chose a submarine because it could be at the launch site in a quick manner. A bomber, lets say from Whiteman AFB, would take longer.

Again I still support our men and women Air Missileers who are somewhere in under the farmland of the United States
12 posted on 05/22/2006 10:59:36 PM PDT by garbageseeker ("Opinion is ultimately determined by feeling and not by intellect" Herbert Spenser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson