Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: luvbach1
When I used the term Bushbot it was in general and was not directed at a specific person. As such it was not a personal attack. I define Bushbot as one who can not tolerate any criticism of the POTUS. I reserve the right to define it as I choose since it is not in my dictionary. Another poster voluteered to that she was a proud Bushbot although she disagreed with the president in other areas. I responded that while she could call herself a Bushbot, I did not have to. That was the extent of my "personal attacks." And although I paraphrased in this post, I did re-read my posts and the replies re use Bushbot. And I did agreed, when asked, that Bushbot could be a pjorative, but since I didn't direct the term at an indvidual (she claimed it) it could hardly have have been a personal attack.

I have no idea why you addressed this yawn of a post to me.

358 posted on 05/23/2006 10:51:47 AM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies ]


To: M. Thatcher

Sorry it bored you. I did not know how to address it for general consumption.


368 posted on 05/23/2006 11:32:00 AM PDT by luvbach1 (More true now than ever: Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson