Skip to comments.
Risk Of Asteroid Smashing Into Earth Reduced (Apophis)
New Scientist ^
| 5-22-2006
| Kelly Young
Posted on 05/22/2006 4:52:42 PM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
1
posted on
05/22/2006 4:52:46 PM PDT
by
blam
To: SunkenCiv
2
posted on
05/22/2006 4:53:25 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
3
posted on
05/22/2006 4:53:47 PM PDT
by
headsonpikes
(Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism.)
To: blam
I'll sleep much better now, thank you!
4
posted on
05/22/2006 4:56:20 PM PDT
by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN - 3rd Bn. Fifth Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle!)
To: blam
The odds of an Earth impact by Apophis in 2036 have now been reduced from 1 in 5500 to 1 in 24,000,
Oh, I know that makes ME feel so much better.....
5
posted on
05/22/2006 4:56:27 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: blam
That's a relief. Bruce Willis will be really old by 2036.
6
posted on
05/22/2006 4:56:41 PM PDT
by
John Jorsett
(scam never sleeps)
To: blam
We have to wait until 2013 to find out? The suspense is killing me.
7
posted on
05/22/2006 4:57:50 PM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2006, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: Cyber Liberty
We'll all be dead from West Nile Virus, Bird Flu, or global warming by then.
8
posted on
05/22/2006 5:04:16 PM PDT
by
Kenny Bunkport
(As the Democrat Party becomes more evil, the GOP becomes more stupid. What's a voter to do?)
To: blam
The odds of collision are the same. Nobody has done anything to change the odds. We are no safer than we were. Now, if we really want to change the odds we need to actually do something such as put some hardware out in space so we can change the momentum vector. But, doing anything these days seems to take Congress and several $ billion and a declaration of human rights violations and investigations of charges of bribery and racism.
9
posted on
05/22/2006 5:04:23 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
To: RightWhale
We'd probably push the wrong way and cause it to hit us.
10
posted on
05/22/2006 5:06:36 PM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2006, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: blam
Rove! Get that "Asteroid Destroys Earth" machine fixed... STAT!
11
posted on
05/22/2006 5:06:47 PM PDT
by
fhlh
(Polls are for Strippers.)
I thought that it was Anubis who chucked the asteroid at us; not Apophis.
12
posted on
05/22/2006 5:09:39 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
(Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
To: blam
Whew, that brought the blood pressure down. Don't forget to ping us all again in 30 years.
13
posted on
05/22/2006 5:09:45 PM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: blam
They found its speed was 6 millimetres per second different than what they had expected. "It's just a small correction in the orbit that propagates forward in time enough to reduce the probability of impact," Wow! If the doctor tells you the bullet missed your heart by 6 millimeters, d'ya feel lucky?
To: Cyber Liberty
15
posted on
05/22/2006 5:16:00 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
To: blam
Many of these asteroids are never spotted until they have just missed us. A prominent astronomer (forget the name, the one a few comets are named after) said he is convinced that if we are hit, we won't see it coming until the asteroid has slipped into the atmosphere.
16
posted on
05/22/2006 5:16:25 PM PDT
by
Williams
To: blam
They found its speed was 6 millimetres per second different than what they had expected.
Orbital physics IS an exact science.
17
posted on
05/22/2006 5:18:37 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: Williams
At least then we wouldn't have the time to listen to liberals complaining.
18
posted on
05/22/2006 5:19:35 PM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2006, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: Williams
The problem is that the object has to move against the starry background to be noticed, and the one coming right at you won't. It will just get bigger. Radar might work, but the return signal would be lost in background noise until the object is very close.
19
posted on
05/22/2006 5:20:27 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
To: cripplecreek
It's the measurement that worries me. What if the new measurement turns out to be 12 mm/sec off the other way?
Bam.
:^O
20
posted on
05/22/2006 5:21:35 PM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2006, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson