"To suggest we don't have "real men" running this war is complete foolishness (at best) and utterly disgusting (at worse). We have real men not only running this war but ten's of thousands of them putting their as$es on the line 24/7"
That I agree with 100%! However we had eight years under the Clinton Administration to infest our military with operatives or at least twist the rules to be "politically correct." Being politically correct simply means placing something illogical ahead of common sense; slightly favoring one person over another to meet your diversity goals instead of seeking the absolute best person for the job. Instituting stupid rules to test social experiments or something like that. Just consider the tail hook scandal to see what I am talking about. That scandal was an attempt by the feminists to destroy our military. Also, real men are needed in the Congress; masculine behavior seems to be discouraged by many of our Congressional overseers, especially the socialist Democrats and cohorts that might be classified as the enemy within.
I suspect that we did not purge the military of the Clintonista operatives; they are not real men (or real women). I also still am concerned that we are making some of the same politically-motivated mistakes that we made in Vietnam, especially those outside of the CIC and SecDef. With scum like Murtha, Kerry, Kennedy, former President Carter, Madam Half-bright, and many more on the outside just hoping against hope that we fail. This does not help. This however, should help to clarify what I meant by real men. God Bless our military and God Bless the USA!
Completely agree with you here -
Yet of late we have a segment of our base who seems willing to stick a knife in the back of our warriors off fighting by giving control of Congress to the anti-American, anti-military, anti-success in the WOT Democrat ilk -
Best regards,