Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coop
Were the ROE's changed recently?
63 posted on 05/22/2006 5:32:19 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: mad_as_he$$; DevSix
I can't imagine the ROEs were significantly changed recently. Here's a snippet from Jan 03. Pretty standard, IMHO:

2. The use of force, including deadly force, is authorized to protect the following:

ROE

That permissive phrase allows our troops to use deadly force if, in their judgment, they are at risk of life/limb or "friendlies" identified by ROE are at risk.

If the ROE were as restrictive as some here claim (such as the MYTH that our troops cannot attack mosques, even when fired upon from a mosque), our troops would not be conducting so many offensive operations. Dev, anything to add? You're more up on current policies and the like.

77 posted on 05/22/2006 6:08:46 PM PDT by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson