Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Plan to Replace the Dollar With the 'Amero'
RaiderNewsService.com ^ | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 05/22/2006 3:42:25 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2

by Jerome R. Corsi

The idea to form the North American Union as a super-NAFTA knitting together Canada, the United States and Mexico into a super-regional political and economic entity was a key agreement resulting from the March 2005 meeting held at Baylor University in Waco, Tex., between President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin.

A joint statement published by the three presidents following their Baylor University summit announced the formation of an initial entity called, “The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” (SPP). The joint statement termed the SPP a “trilateral partnership” that was aimed at producing a North American security plan as well as providing free market movement of people, capital, and trade across the borders between the three NAFTA partners:

We will establish a common approach to security to protect North America from external threats, prevent and respond to threats within North America, and further streamline the secure and efficient movement of legitimate, low-risk traffic across our borders.

A working agenda was established:

We will establish working parties led by our ministers and secretaries that will consult with stakeholders in our respective countries. These working parties will respond to the priorities of our people and our businesses, and will set specific, measurable, and achievable goals.

The U.S. Department of Commerce has produced a SPP website, which documents how the U.S. has implemented the SPP directive into an extensive working agenda.

Following the March 2005 meeting in Waco, Tex., the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) published in May 2005 a task force report titled “Building a North American Community.” We have already documented that this CFR task force report calls for a plan to create by 2010 a redefinition of boundaries such that the primary immigration control will be around the three countries of the North American Union, not between the three countries. We have argued that a likely reason President Bush has not secured our border with Mexico is that the administration is pushing for the establishment of the North American Union.

The North American Union is envisioned to create a super-regional political authority that could override the sovereignty of the United States on immigration policy and trade issues. In his June 2005 testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Robert Pastor, the Director of the Center for North American Studies at American University, stated clearly the view that the North American Union would need a super-regional governance board to make sure the United States does not dominate the proposed North American Union once it is formed:

NAFTA has failed to create a partnership because North American governments have not changed the way they deal with one another. Dual bilateralism, driven by U.S. power, continue to govern and irritate. Adding a third party to bilateral disputes vastly increases the chance that rules, not power, will resolve problems.

This trilateral approach should be institutionalized in a new North American Advisory Council. Unlike the sprawling and intrusive European Commission, the Commission or Council should be lean, independent, and advisory, composed of 15 distinguished individuals, 5 from each nation. Its principal purpose should be to prepare a North American agenda for leaders to consider at biannual summits and to monitor the implementation of the resulting agreements.

Pastor was a vice chairman of the CFR task force that produced the report “Building a North American Union.”

Pastor also proposed the creation of a Permanent Tribunal on Trade and Investment with the view that “a permanent court would permit the accumulation of precedent and lay the groundwork for North American business law.” The intent is for this North American Union Tribunal would have supremacy over the U.S. Supreme Court on issues affecting the North American Union, to prevent U.S. power from “irritating” and retarding the progress of uniting Canada, Mexico, and the U.S. into a new 21st century super-regional governing body.

Robert Pastor also advises the creation of a North American Parliamentary Group to make sure the U.S. Congress does not impede progress in the envisioned North American Union. He has also called for the creation of a North American Customs and Immigration Service which would have authority over U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) within the Department of Homeland Security.

Pastor’s 2001 book “Toward a North American Community” called for the creation of a North American Union that would perfect the defects Pastor believes limit the progress of the European Union. Much of Pastor’s thinking appears aimed at limiting the power and sovereignty of the United States as we enter this new super-regional entity. Pastor has also called for the creation of a new currency which he has coined the “Amero,” a currency that is proposed to replace the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar, and the Mexican peso.

If President Bush had run openly in 2004 on the proposition that a prime objective of his second term was to form the North American Union and to supplant the dollar with the “Amero,” we doubt very much that President Bush would have carried Ohio, let alone half of the Red State majority he needed to win re-election. Pursuing any plan that would legalize the conservatively estimated 12 million illegal aliens now in the United States could well spell election disaster for the Republican Party in 2006, especially for the House of Representative where every seat is up for grabs.

Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" (along with John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), and "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians." He is a frequent guest on the G. Gordon Liddy radio show. He will soon co-author a new book with Jim Gilchrist on the Minuteman Project.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; amero; borders; bordersecurity; buygold; canada; cfr; corsi; illegalimmigation; mexico; nafta; northamerica; northamericanunion; partnership; prosperity; security; sovereignty; spp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: Iam1ru1-2

Texans make crappy Presidents.


41 posted on 05/22/2006 5:08:41 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (Americans need to remember Osama's "strong horse" -"weak horse" analogy. Let's stop acting weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright once lamented that American military dominance was inherently unfair, and that the best remedy was to assist the advancement of competing military establishments in other countries. Supreme Court Justices Anthony Kennedy and Ruth Ginsburg have, in recent rulings, looked to the laws and governing philosophies of other nations for justification.

But while the majority of Americans do not embrace this contemptible thinking, neither do they stage mass protests in the wake of such court decisions, demanding the ouster of their authors, as would certainly have been the case only a few short years ago. Moreover, it is becoming increasingly evident that such alarming ideologies are not confined to those on the left.

Though the signs of a growing acceptance of this mindset have become glaringly obvious, most Americans remain reluctant to believe that their leaders would even contemplate the forfeiture of this nation’s sovereignty to such a degree. Yet the behavior of high placed individuals, including President Bush, raise extremely disturbing questions as to just how willing they might be to copy the Europeans.

Recently, Mexican Foreign Minister Luis Ernesto Derbez Baustista floated a “trial balloon” during a speech at the University of Texas, ominously revealing a possible answer. According to Baustista, Mexico and the United States should eventually become “integrated,” thus forming what can only be construed as the hub of a “North American Union,” no doubt eventually including Canada as well.

President Bush has indicated a disturbing sympathy towards such thinking, refusing to characterize Mexican immigrants as “illegal.” In contrast, he implies illegality by the “Minutemen” who now protect the border, having described them as “vigilantes.”

Conversely, he discusses the actions of the “undocumented immigrants” as “pursuing their dreams,” seemingly indifferent to the fact that Americans will be forced to shoulder the burden of fulfilling those dreams, ultimately at the expense of their own.

On other crucial fronts, the President clearly shows a willingness to embrace policies that significantly weaken the nation’s borders. When dealing with Canada, he steadfastly advocates a beef import program that clearly puts the interests of Canadian beef producers ahead of their American competitors.

Thus he allows an influx of beef from the north that threatens to seriously degrade this country’s food supply. Though a financial boon to Canadian agriculture, it provides no incentives to enhance the quality of beef produced there while undermining the viability of American cattle growers.

Meanwhile, President Bush has been championing the “Law Of the Sea Treaty” (LOST), whereby seagoing Americans would henceforth be subject to a maritime version of the “International Criminal Court.”

The perceived “benefits” of this blurring of national boundaries might initially sound attractive, particularly to individuals whose primary impetus is monetary. But America stands to lose far more than it could ever hope to gain by compromising its freedom and independence.

Although indispensable to national security, an able military is not the key to a strong nation. Such strength lies within its culture. America cannot remain strong or great if people who uphold neither its society nor its laws, but instead seek only after its wealth, overwhelm it.

Despite the establishment of the “European Union” that continent’s vibrancy and greatness continue to decline as a result of its own cultural erosion. America may soon follow.


42 posted on 05/22/2006 5:13:52 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan; suijuris
Ok. If you can forgive him I can too.

You're off the hook in my book suijuris, because Ohio came to your defense, which is mighty kind of her given your attitude earlier.

I am serious about getting tired of this though. Disagreement is good, backbiting is really uncalled for.
43 posted on 05/22/2006 5:18:51 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
"What is the Council On Foreign Relations?"

http://www.cfr.org/about/

44 posted on 05/22/2006 5:19:13 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Trouble is, it sounds believable.


45 posted on 05/22/2006 5:20:34 PM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
America is dying from within.

And I'm dying from laughter at such a ridiculous statement.

46 posted on 05/22/2006 5:23:39 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

The hilarious thing is that there are people believing they will be carrying Ameros around by 2010.


47 posted on 05/22/2006 5:30:44 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

So the CFR doesn't have any connection to the government?


48 posted on 05/22/2006 5:33:56 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: All

"On March 23, President George W. Bush will host his Mexican and Canadian counterparts at his ranch in Crawford, Texas. A prime topic on the trilateral agenda will be the porosity of the borders between the U.S. and its neighbors to the north and south.

In anticipation of this session, Mexican President Vicente Fox has played the victimization card. At a March 16 press conference, he stated that new walls running along parts of the U.S.-Mexico frontier “must be demolished” because they are “discriminatory” and “against freedom.” “No country that is proud of itself should build walls,” he added. “It doesn’t make any sense.”

Conditions along the Rio Grande bear heavily on national security, and President Bush must not allow President Fox to dominate the parleys with self-serving tirades about U.S. policy. In addition to ensuring the security of the U.S.- Canada and U.S.-Mexico borders, North American decision makers must focus on the 600-mile Mexican-Guatemalan interface. Mexico’s southern flank—an open sesame for drug traffickers, illegal aliens, smugglers, and terrorists— constitutes a porous, crime-ridden, and largely neglected third border of the United States."


49 posted on 05/22/2006 5:37:00 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
"And I'm dying from laughter at such a ridiculous statement."

But I bet you believe the "da Vinci code" book is "truth", right?

50 posted on 05/22/2006 5:38:24 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish; You Dirty Rats
They are backbiters because they can't win arguments in a legitimate fashion, polly.

They are driven by reactionary emotion, and not by thought.

And because of that, they are in no way, shape, or form conservative.

That's why they are best ignored (especially after we've beaten them to a pulp ;). It must be a miserable existence they live, and it's best that we not allow ourselves to be infected by their poison.

51 posted on 05/22/2006 5:43:23 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
But I bet you believe the "da Vinci code" book is "truth", right?

I have not read the book and I won't see the movie.

52 posted on 05/22/2006 5:44:01 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2; You Dirty Rats

What a bizarre leap. Da Vinci code?? ROFLOL!


53 posted on 05/22/2006 5:47:24 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

And I'm dying from laughter at such a ridiculous statement.
-----
Yes, just keep laughing as you watch reality. Just keep an eye on what the illegal immigration bill is going to do -- with our social security being given to illegals already, the Congress working hard to give AMNESTY to ANYONE OR ANYTHING that ensures they get re-elected, e.g. the Mexican vote and the campaign-dollar donators...yes, just keep laughing as the hoards just keep coming into our country uncontrolled....your own government making a mockery of our system of laws, and rewarding criminal anarchists....yes, real funny isn't it???



54 posted on 05/22/2006 5:53:15 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

I am sure the CFR is behind the DaVinci Codes as well. Dan Brown is just their pawn.


55 posted on 05/22/2006 5:53:42 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

These conspiracy theories seem to be showing up all over the place.

It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.


56 posted on 05/22/2006 5:59:13 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Glad I read your tagline. ;)


57 posted on 05/22/2006 6:02:55 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish; You Dirty Rats
It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

You got THAT right.

58 posted on 05/22/2006 6:03:41 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

OMYGOSH the black helicopters!!! :)


59 posted on 05/22/2006 6:03:55 PM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

It's funny for me personally because my father and uncle were major players on the Trilateral Commission. It makes no difference who is President of what country or what currency is used because we rule the world from the basement of Chase Manhattan Bank anyway.


60 posted on 05/22/2006 6:04:37 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson