Hiding behind nominal femininity, they have (individually speaking) proven themselves capable of relentless predation on the emotionally weak in their own feminine ranks, and have been observed taking advantage of emotional situations no self-respecting gentleman would.
In one instance, one known to me demonstrated she knew exactly what she was doing as she sidled up to a distraught woman who had just had a nasty argument with her boyfriend/husband, and started rendering 'sympathy'. The grin she gave me when she caught me looking at her said it all. She knew I knew.
When those who blame men for their ills try to outdo the cartoonish evil they say men have perpetrated upon them, it goes beyond penis envy run amok and betrays the root selfishness and callous disregard they posess for their fellow humans of either gender.
This is just a logical extension of that selfishness.
Better they get a puppy, at least it will have a chance to find a loving home later when they discard it.
It comes to mind that there is a certain level of socialibility and deemed worthiness, whatever the standard, required for two opposite sexes to mate, at least willingly.
No such constraint is involved in parthenogenisis.
The offspring of such a self-union have the gross potential to carry on whatever traits the remainder of the population deemed so undesireable as to shun their genetics.
It is the epitomy of vanity, narcissism cubed.
What is described in the article is not parthenogenesis. When two nucleii are combined in a single ovum then stimulated to become a zygote it is somatic cell nuclear transfer with a twist. Parthenogenesis is 'spontaneous' zygote formation by a single nucleus ovum.