Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Open Borders? Why Not?
The Wall Street Journal ^ | July 2, 2001 | ROBERT L. BARTLEY

Posted on 05/21/2006 10:47:45 PM PDT by Plutarch

Reformist Mexican President Vincente Fox raises eyebrows with his suggestion that over a decade or two Nafta should evolve into something like the European Union, with open borders for not only goods and investment but also people. He can rest assured that there is one voice north of the Rio Grande that supports his vision. To wit, this newspaper.

Indeed, during the immigration debate of 1984 we suggested an ultimate goal to guide passing policies -- a constitutional amendment: "There shall be open borders."

--------------------------Snip--------------------------

Today the GOP is led by George W. Bush, who told campaign audiences "family values do not stop at the Rio Grande." The employer sanctions in the 1986 Simpson-Mazzoli bill are now recognized as windmill tilting.

--------------------------Snip--------------------------

Another amnesty for undocumented aliens is already in the air; every decade or so Congress somehow or another faces this reality. Even opening Nafta borders completely, I would dare to suggest, might not unleash a new flood of immigrants. There is a limit to the number who actually want to come, and experience suggests that many of those who do already can find a way. And after all, we did have a long history of unlimited quotas for Western Hemisphere immigrants, ending only in 1965.

President Fox is nothing if not a visionary. Many scoffed at his ambition to unseat the machine that had run Mexico for generations; now they scoff at his proposals on immigration. But over the decade or two he mentioned, a Nafta with open borders may yet prove not so wild a dream.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: aliens; borders; obl; robertbartley; wsj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: T.L.Sink
Vdare has an excellent summary of the WSJ Editorial page and immigration over the years, including the full text of the infamous In Praise of Huddled Masses from 1984, calling for a Constitutional Admendment for Open Borders.

The entire unexcerpted Open Borders editorial can be viewed here .

41 posted on 05/22/2006 5:28:10 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Like the Senate, the WSJ sees this country as nothing more than a marketplace.


42 posted on 05/22/2006 5:30:05 PM PDT by toddlintown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

What are you smoking?


43 posted on 05/22/2006 5:32:43 PM PDT by toddlintown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G

You got it dead on. Any notion of a world government is pure socialism. This country tried socialism in the early colonies. It failed as those able to work did not. Those who think that free market capitalism does not work, only need to move to Canada or Europe. I am no prospect to pay the high taxes these countries have to support those who do little, if anything. The League of Nations was a failure and so is the UN. I am beginning to wonder what our schools and universities are teaching? It certainly is not pro American.


44 posted on 05/22/2006 6:01:11 PM PDT by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Lumper20
"Any notion of a world government is pure socialism. This country tried socialism in the early colonies. It failed as those able to work did not. Those who think that free market capitalism does not work, only need to move to Canada or Europe. I am no prospect to pay the high taxes these countries have to support those who do little, if anything. The League of Nations was a failure and so is the UN. I am beginning to wonder what our schools and universities are teaching? It certainly is not pro American."

QFE!

45 posted on 05/22/2006 6:02:45 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: conservativeinmt
Emigrants from a 3rd world country, unwilling to assimilate, demanding undeserved rights will deflate the wage of a job that was considered a trade not too long ago.

Amen Brother.

46 posted on 05/22/2006 6:04:53 PM PDT by humblegunner (If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Glad you posted the 1965 Immigration Act. It was perhaps the biggest lie ever pulled on Americans. Could this be when Ted K set up his off shore accounts?


47 posted on 05/22/2006 6:06:52 PM PDT by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

Even Israel????


48 posted on 05/24/2006 5:02:44 PM PDT by freddymuldoon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson