Posted on 05/21/2006 4:06:24 PM PDT by Larousse2
Mexico Voters Fear Nation on Edge of Chaos
By JULIE WATSON, Associated Press Writer Wed May 17, 6:12 AM ET
Police enraged by the kidnapping of six officers club unarmed detainees. A bloody battle between steelworkers and police leaves two miners dead. Drug lords post the heads of decapitated police on a fence to show who's in charge.
Less than two months before Mexicans elect their next president, many fear the country is teetering on the edge of chaos — a perception that could hurt the ruling National Action Party's chances of keeping the presidency and benefit Mexico's once-powerful Institutional Revolutionary Party, whose candidate has been trailing badly.
Some blame President Vicente Fox for a weak government. Others say rivals are instigating the violence to create that impression, hoping to hurt National Action candidate Felipe Calderon, who has a slight lead in recent polls.
A poll published Friday in Excelsior newspaper found 50 percent of respondents feared the government was on the brink of losing control. The polling company Parametria conducted face-to-face interviews at 1,000 homes across Mexico. The poll had a margin of error of 3 percentage points.
The conflicts are "a warning sign," said Yamel Nares, Parametria's research director.
Security is the top concern for Mexicans, and Fox has struggled to reform Mexico's notoriously corrupt police. Meanwhile, drug-related bloodshed has accelerated, with some cities seeing killings almost daily.
In April, suspected drug lords posted the heads of two police officers on a wall outside a government building where four drug traffickers died in a Jan. 27 shootout with officers in the Pacific resort of Acapulco.
A sign nearby read: "So that you learn to respect."
Last week, Zapatista rebel leader Subcomandante Marcos said Mexico was in a "state of rage," and warned that tensions were similar to those that preceded the Zapatistas' brief armed uprising in January 1994 in the southern state of Chiapas.
He said his group is committed to peace, but many fear his increased public profile — after years of hiding out in the jungle — could foreshadow greater polarization among Mexican voters.
The masked leader said a May 3 clash that left a teenager dead and scores injured in San Salvador Atenco, 15 miles northeast of Mexico City, is an example of the growing tensions.
Marcos has been leading nearly daily demonstrations in the town following the incident, which began when a radical group of townspeople kidnapped and beat six policemen in a dispute over unlicensed flower vendors. Police responded with rage the next day. Television crews captured officers repeatedly beating unarmed protesters, and several detained women alleged officers raped them.
The clash followed another bloody battle between steelworkers and police trying to break up an illegal strike at a plant in Lazaro Cardenas last month. Unions later threatened to shut down the country.
George Grayson, a Mexico expert at the College of William & Mary, said the violence reflects Fox's lack of leadership.
"The state has become much weaker under his watch," Grayson said.
Recent polls show Calderon has overtaken longtime presidential front-runner Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, whom opponents have portrayed as a leftist demagogue similar to Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.
But that could change if PRI candidate Roberto Madrazo can convince voters that Mexico was more stable under his party's 71-year reign, which ended with Fox's victory in 2000. Mexican law bars presidents from seeking re-election.
Madrazo has tried to paint himself as the law-and-order candidate — though so far his poll numbers have remained well behind those of Calderon and Lopez Obrador.
"It's not going to help Lopez Obrador who has been associated with the rabble rousers, but Madrazo can come out and say with his party at least Mexico had continued stability," Grayson said.
Gerardo Aranda, a tourism guide in Mexico City, said he won't go back to the PRI, but he doesn't know who he will vote for.
"No one really knows now what could happen next," he said. "All the candidates are bad. ... There is so much anger toward the government, everyone is against everything."
yeah, that is a true neighbor and friend. (sarcasm)
Gotcha!
He was very kind and pleasant to talk to, and he seemed to try to be as helpful to me as possible.
I don't even download those security warning anymore for fear gates is crawling inside my 'puter.
Pancho Villa
Isn't this ridiculous? American patriots being treated as the enemy of the state, when the elephant in the room is the 30 million illegals.
Good grief!
Nawh!
Somebody with more machizzzmo:-)
That's it! "Revenge." Thank you:-)
I loved that film, except for the part where they sliced up her face; threw her in a brothel, and plied her with "controlled substances."
Time for me to take my shooting lesson from watching Brie Van de Camp.
BBL.
(((((((((((((((((((((((((Hugs)))))))))))))))))))))))
"Do we need pistoleros in the street of San Antonio and Los Angeles?"
Robby, we've already got thousands of pistoleros on the streets of LA.
You would have to mandate the English language to do so. I agree, that country is slipping into absolute chaos. Soon it will become a certified threat to the USA. But we still won't be popular when we annex it!
I have thought all along that one reason for W's seemingly counterintuitive support for the Mexican invasion is a fear of chaos and revolution in Mexico that brings another Marxist to power. It is misguided because all the pressure relieving is not going to prevent the chaos. Either the Mex government will get a handle on it or it won't. Meanwhile we sure as h311 don't need to be importing all those Mexican druggies and revolutionaries.
To prevent duplication, please do not alter the heading. Thanks.
The problems of Mexico transcend Fox. Mexico is a failed state - and it is a poor, failed state with a large population and located along a long relatively open border with the US.
"merge Mexico into the U.S."
I think that's exactly what Bush is trying to do.
Actually it would not eliminate illegal immigration-just move the border farther south. The border would be a much shorter line but the terrain is jungle and mountains, not desert.
That would give the democrats ten new Marxist senators and a couple of hundred congressman wearing Che Guevarra t-shirts. Bright idea, Einstein.
Bribery is rampant because the government is bureaucratic totalitarian. It is terribly inefficient totalism but totalitarian nonetheless. To do anything in Mexico, set up a business, whateveer, requires the approval of many different bureaucrats. As we see developing here, the more the government is who to go to to be allowed to do something the more is bribery necessary for anything to happen at all.The more regulation the more corruption. It is inherent in the concept.
...and probably much easier to defend and build a wall across.
It would probably mean more coastline to defend, more hurricanes and earthquakes disrupting things but there would also be some great resort areas too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.