To: Gabz
I defended women who chose single motherhood who were rape victims against the absolutists on this thread that said NO woman should EVER choose to be a single mother and if they find themselves pregnant should put the child up for adoption.So you are saying there is nothing wrong with the practice...after all, you have no idea if, or how often, such situations will turn out like your friend's. Don't you find your position somewhat doctrinaire?
467 posted on
05/21/2006 9:25:27 PM PDT by
papertyger
(Our Constitution isn't perfect, but it's better than what we have right now.)
To: papertyger
So you are saying there is nothing wrong with the practice...after all, you have no idea if, or how often, such situations will turn out like your friend's. Don't you find your position somewhat doctrinaire? I said no such thing. Therefore your question is irrelevent.
You are choosing to make an absolutist statement, I'm saying because there are exceptions to the rule the abosolutist ideal of all children conceived of rape should be placed for adoption is wrong.
476 posted on
05/21/2006 9:37:47 PM PDT by
Gabz
(Proud to be a WalMartian --- beep)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson