[papertyger]

But they still allow single people to adopt.

Proving?

Please tell me, how many of us have lived in the 'best case scenario'?

And how does that excuse a woman from removing a child from the pool of possibilities at the 'best case scenario'?

You make it sound as if you do not live in the best case scenario...

Care to support that gratuitous assertion?

If so, you've just condemned half of freerepublic.

If so, why should that be of concern? I am either correct, or I am not. Who or how many agree is totally irrelevant.

Tell me, would you have more sympathy for a single woman who sleeps around, gets pregnant, and keeps her child (whether or not she can financially support it) than a single woman who makes a conscious decision to have a child she knows she can support and love?

Yes.

[rintense]

Tell me, would you have more sympathy for a single woman who sleeps around, gets pregnant, and keeps her child (whether or not she can financially support it) than a single woman who makes a conscious decision to have a child she knows she can support and love?

Yes.

That tells me all I need to know.