Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: durasell
How does it benefit the government to regulate smoking in private establishments? Especially when they tax it?

The same public health/expense excuse can be made to monitor just about every aspect of your private life, if the intent is there. 'Public health costs' have become the Interstate Commerce Clause of the war on privacy and private property--carte blanche.

Once the laws and monitoring systems are in place, the associated laws become a device for generating revenue through fines for violations. Violations are reported by computers, what a regulatory wet dream! Kind of like having a camera on a stoplight or an automatic camera rigged to a radar gun hidden in the weeds. It does not exist as a deterrent--a police car would do more, it exists to produce revenue.

Having automatic systems to record your violations, purchased by you at your expense makes the whole idea even more cost-effective. Stiff fines, forced labor ("commmunity service"), etc. all can be levied on the violator, and even more drastic measures on the black marketeer, whose very existence would justify large labor segments of government jobs. Call it something catchy like the "War on Fat"...

113 posted on 05/21/2006 12:45:43 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

I'd be more concerned about private enterprises using the data. Figure before you go to buy health insurance the company runs a scan of shopping habits -- purchased from grocery stores, credit card companies etc. -- to see if you're eating healthy and not taking risks.


114 posted on 05/21/2006 12:49:00 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson