To: tbird5
If we did it now, it would be considered to. But during WWII that is the way both sides fought.
2 posted on
05/20/2006 8:34:40 PM PDT by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: bnelson44
Why didn't he write a book about a war criminal who commanded a seal team in Viet Nam that butchered woman and children, came home, ran as a Left wing "War Hero" and was elected Senator, retired after being on a panel that was critical of our treatment of terrorist prisoners and now heads an extreme left wing college in New York City?
61 posted on
05/20/2006 9:10:34 PM PDT by
TET1968
(SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
To: bnelson44
People need face reality. Go to war, people die; both the ones that shoot and the ones that make. Don't play the game if your afraid to do what must be done.
146 posted on
05/20/2006 10:03:48 PM PDT by
Dawggie
To: bnelson44
But during WWII that is the way both sides fought. Now,in the WOT, it is the way only ONE side fights. America observes Marquis de Queensbury rules of etiquitte while pursuing this war.
250 posted on
05/21/2006 4:45:36 AM PDT by
nonliberal
(Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson