Replies

Still undecided. Russ is a possiblity unless I learn of something that would definitely disqualify him. I also like Hagan Smith of the CP. Neither of these men have a good chance of winning, but so far Swann has not given me a reason to support him. He is tied too closely with the crew that we just bounced on Tuesday. Perhaps if he gives us more than platitudes and can prove that he isn't a puppet of the corrupt GOP machine, he can still earn my vote.

Rendell does deserve another term, but it should be served in a federal penitentiary.

Diamond is a definite NO for me. First off, I'm not a Libertarian, I'm more a fan of the Constitution party. I think he had his own agenda all along. His behavior when he left Clean Sweep was not exactly keeping the best interests of the cause or the supporters at heart. Then there's his choice of running mate. That guy is a multiple loser who even tried to switch and run as a Dem to get elected. He isn't very forthcoming on his campaign contributions, either. Why would an "incumbent-ouster" (who, BTW, is also a failed candidate) pick such an opportunist? Diamond knows he has zero chance of winning, yet he also must know that his presence on the ticket will water down the conservative vote and likely mean the WORST INCUMBENT of all will remain in power. I knew from the start the Reps would be the only ones with stones enough to toss their incumbents. I'm not so sure he's not a Dem tool.

As for Hagan, if his campaign page is any indication of the way he would govern, he's also out. If you can't bother with the basics of proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation, how are you going to see to the details of running a state government?

Swann will get my vote. I'd rather poke my eyes out with a sharp stick than do anything to facilitate Fast Eddie's reelection.