To: taxcontrol
I disagree. I think a RINO is worse than a Dem. With a RINO, conservatives are being fooled into voting to support someone that they THINK will support conservative values. At least with a Dem, you KNOW that they will NOT support conservative values.
I have never understood this excuse for logic. It is better to know you are going to get screwed than to occasionally get screwed when you weren't expecting it? Anyone who thinks like that shouldn't be allowed to vote.
287 posted on
05/20/2006 6:32:35 PM PDT by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
To: Mind-numbed Robot
To quote a predominant somebody: "I would sooner vote for Al-Qaeda than vote for a Democrat".
292 posted on
05/20/2006 6:41:08 PM PDT by
wolficatZ
(Detective Chief Superintendent Christopher Foyle -"You'll hang for this!")
To: Mind-numbed Robot
You know, I think I've figured out that this thread, and any other thread like it, is a waste of time. I hope I remember that fact. Because all that's going on is that people who are pissed off are throwing a tantrum, and anyone who argues for common sense is going to serve as a surrogate punching bag for the terminally disgruntled. What's the point of that? Let em rant at someone else. Life's too short.
294 posted on
05/20/2006 6:43:33 PM PDT by
Huck
(Hey look, I'm still here.)
To: Mind-numbed Robot
Well it is a good thing that no one has appointed you the decider of who has the right to vote then.
The point you seem to be missing is that when there is NO DIFFERENCE between a RINO and a Dem... it does not matter who you vote for. Since we want to CHANGE who is in office, loosing one term to a Dem so that you can replace that RINO with a conservative is painful medicine for sure... but that is a better long term strategy than simply sit there with festering RINO who is voting like a Dem anyway.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson