[Mind-numbed Robot]

I disagree. I think a RINO is worse than a Dem. With a RINO, conservatives are being fooled into voting to support someone that they THINK will support conservative values.

At least with a Dem, you KNOW that they will NOT support conservative values.

I have never understood this excuse for logic. It is better to know you are going to get screwed than to occasionally get screwed when you weren't expecting it? Anyone who thinks like that shouldn't be allowed to vote.

[wolficatZ]

To quote a predominant somebody: "I would sooner vote for Al-Qaeda than vote for a Democrat".

[Huck]

You know, I think I've figured out that this thread, and any other thread like it, is a waste of time. I hope I remember that fact. Because all that's going on is that people who are pissed off are throwing a tantrum, and anyone who argues for common sense is going to serve as a surrogate punching bag for the terminally disgruntled. What's the point of that? Let em rant at someone else. Life's too short.

[taxcontrol]

Well it is a good thing that no one has appointed you the decider of who has the right to vote then.

The point you seem to be missing is that when there is NO DIFFERENCE between a RINO and a Dem... it does not matter who you vote for. Since we want to CHANGE who is in office, loosing one term to a Dem so that you can replace that RINO with a conservative is painful medicine for sure... but that is a better long term strategy than simply sit there with festering RINO who is voting like a Dem anyway.