[CWOJackson]

Maybe if you read post number 2 you will see that I did read his column and even quoted a portion from near the end where I agree with his article.

And while people's attention have been so "absorbed exclusively on this issue" the House used it as cover to stick it to us again.

[Soul Seeker]

Actually, I did read that post.

Maybe it's a comprehension problem?

Maybe if you read David's column and listened to what he is saying you'd understand why our attention is absorbed exclusively on this issue?

Maybe I wasn't clear enough with the joined statements? Usually the "and" serves to clear up any confusion.

But, as with david's column, you don't want to hear.

BTW, is this what is known as thread Hijacking? Attempting to divert attention to another topic? usually border folks are jumped on for that....I've lectured them about it myself. If you want to discuss other matters about the House, there are other threads for that....though it's pretty obvious your real upset is that you wish this issue to die down because it's hurting the precious party establishment. :-)